Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33685524›Full record

ReviewMaternal health, neonatology and perinatology2021

Methods for exploring the faecal microbiome of premature infants: a review.

Jacob A F Westaway, Roger Huerlimann, Catherine M Miller, Yoga Kandasamy, Robert Norton, Donna Rudd

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jacob A F WestawayJames Cook University, 1 McGregor Road, Smithfield, QLD, 4878, Australia. jacob.westaway@my.jcu.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5171-819X
Roger HuerlimannJames Cook University, 1 James Cook Dr, Douglas, QLD, 4811, Australia.
Catherine M MillerJames Cook University, 1 McGregor Road, Smithfield, QLD, 4878, Australia.
Yoga KandasamyTownsville University Hospital, 100 Angus Smith Dr, Douglas, QLD, 4814, Australia.
Robert NortonPathology Queensland, 100 Angus Smith Dr, Douglas, QLD, 4814, Australia.
Donna RuddJames Cook University, 1 James Cook Dr, Douglas, QLD, 4811, Australia.
James Cook University · AUQueensland Health · AUTownsville Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The premature infant gut microbiome plays an important part in infant health and development, and recognition of the implications of microbial dysbiosis in premature infants has prompted significant research into these issues. The approaches to designing investigations into microbial populations are many and varied, each with its own benefits and limitations. The technique used can influence results, contributing to heterogeneity across studies. This review aimed to describe the most common techniques used in researching the preterm infant microbiome, detailing their various limitations. The objective was to provide those entering the field with a broad understanding of available methodologies, so that the likely effects of their use can be factored into literature interpretation and future study design. We found that although many techniques are used for characterising the premature infant microbiome, 16S rRNA short amplicon sequencing is the most common. 16S rRNA short amplicon sequencing has several benefits, including high accuracy, discoverability and high throughput capacity. However, this technique has limitations. Each stage of the protocol offers opportunities for the injection of bias. Bias can contribute to variability between studies using 16S rRNA high throughout sequencing. Thus, we recommend that the interpretation of previous results and future study design be given careful consideration.

Indexed as

DysbiosisMicrobiomeNeonatePremature

Identifiers

PMID33685524
PMCPMC7941982
OpenAlexW3135868222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.