Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33685473›Full record

ArticleBMC medical ethics2021

Enhancing patient safety by integrating ethical dimensions to Critical Incident Reporting Systems.

Kai Wehkamp, Eva Kuhn, Rainer Petzina, Alena Buyx, Annette Rogge

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical ethics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. [Further Development of Maturity Levels of Quality and Risk Management System at the University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein].Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kai WehkampDepartment of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller Str. 3 (K3), 24105, Kiel, Germany. kai.wehkamp@uksh.de.ORCID 0000-0003-3536-4958
Eva KuhnSection Global Health, Institute of Hygiene and Public Health, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Rainer PetzinaQuality and Risk Management, Patient Safety, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
Alena BuyxInstitute of History and Ethics in Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Annette RoggeDepartment of Medical Ethics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
MSH Medical School Hamburg – University of Applied Sciences and Medical University · DETechnical University of Munich · DEUniversity Hospital Bonn · DEUniversity Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCritical Incident Reporting Systems (CIRS) provide a well-proven method to identify clinical risks in hospitals. All professions can report critical incidents anonymously, low-threshold, and without sanctions. Reported cases are processed to preventive measures that improve patient and staff safety. Clinical ethics consultations offer support for ethical conflicts but are dependent on the interaction with staff and management to be effective. The aim of this study was to investigate the rationale of integrating an ethical focus into CIRS.

methodsA six-step approach combined the analysis of CIRS databases, potential cases, literature on clinical and organizational ethics, cases from ethics consultations, and experts' experience to construct a framework for CIRS cases with ethical relevance and map the categories with principles of biomedical ethics.

resultsFour main categories of critical incidents with ethical relevance were derived: (1) patient-related communication; (2) consent, autonomy, and patient interest; (3) conflicting economic and medical interests; (4) staff communication and corporate culture. Each category was refined with different subcategories and mapped with case examples and exemplary related ethical principles to demonstrate ethical relevance.

conclusionThe developed framework for CIRS cases with its ethical dimensions demonstrates the relevance of integrating ethics into the concept of risk-, quality-, and organizational management. It may also support clinical ethics consultations' presence and effectiveness. The proposed enhancement could contribute to hospitals' ethical infrastructure and may increase ethical behavior, patient safety, and employee satisfaction.

Indexed as

Patient SafetyRisk ManagementCommunicationHospitalsHumansCategorizationCIRSEthics managementHealthcareQuality managementRisk management

Identifiers

PMID33685473
PMCPMC7941704
OpenAlexW3133805210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.