Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33685463›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2021

'Every medicine is part poison': a qualitative inquiry into the perceptions and experiences of choosing contraceptive methods of migrant Chinese women living in Australia.

Hankiz Dolan, Mu Li, Deborah Bateson, Rachel Thompson, Chun Wah Michael Tam, Carissa Bonner, Lyndal Trevena

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Exploring the expectations, experiences and tensions of refugee patients and general practitioners in the quality of care in general practice.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hankiz DolanSchool of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Room 125, Edward Ford Building, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia. hekp5025@uni.sydney.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-3185-168X
Mu LiSchool of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Room 125, Edward Ford Building, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Deborah BatesonFamily Planning NSW, Sydney, NSW, 2131, Australia.
Rachel ThompsonSchool of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Room 125, Edward Ford Building, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Chun Wah Michael TamPrimary and Integrated Care Unit, South Western Sydney Local Health District, Liverpool, NSW, 2170, Australia.
Carissa BonnerSchool of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Room 125, Edward Ford Building, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Lyndal TrevenaSchool of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Room 125, Edward Ford Building, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
The University of Sydney · AUNew South Wales Department of Health · AU

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council 1106452
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Australia, ethnic Chinese people are one of the largest, youngest and fastest growing overseas-born groups. Yet, little is known about their perceptions of contraceptive methods and their experiences with choosing one. Decisions about contraceptive methods are preference sensitive. Understanding the influencing factors of Chinese migrant women's contraceptive method choice and practices will help cater to their decision-making needs in a culturally sensitive and responsive way.

methodsA qualitative study design underpinned by critical realism approach was used to explore Chinese migrant women's perceptions and experiences of choosing contraceptive methods. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 22 women who self-identified as being ethnically Chinese and had been living in Australia for no more than 10 years. The interview guide was adapted from the Ottawa Decision Support Framework. Majority of the interviews were conducted in Mandarin Chinese. Transcribed data was analysed using thematic analysis method.

resultsFour major themes were identified, including: 'every medicine is part poison: hormonal contraceptives cause harm to the body'; 'intrauterine device, a device used in the past for married women'; 'it takes two (or one) to decide, depending on the relationship dynamics and contraception preferences'; and 'it is not necessary to seek medical advice in choosing contraceptive methods'.

conclusionsOur findings suggest that Chinese migrant women's perceptions and experiences of choosing contraceptive methods are influenced by complex personal, cultural, societal and inter-relational factors. Chinese migrant women were cautious of using hormonal methods due to fears of side-effects, including reduced or absent menstrual bleeding. Women were also reluctant to consider intrauterine devices as options due to associating them with past experiences of other women and themselves and also fears of potential complications. There was a reluctant attitude towards seeking medical advice regarding contraception due to beliefs that needing to use contraception is not an illness requiring treatment. Such findings are likely to be useful in increasing healthcare professionals' and policy makers' understanding of Chinese migrant women's contraceptive method preferences, beliefs and behaviours. They also help to develop culturally and linguistically sensitive strategies, which goes beyond the provision of contraceptive counselling, in assisting Chinese migrant women's decision-making needs.

Indexed as

PoisonsTransients and MigrantsAustraliaChinaContraceptionFemaleHumansPerceptionPoisonsChinese migrant womenContraceptionCritical realismDecision-making

Identifiers

PMID33685463
PMCPMC7938530
OpenAlexW3133583342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.