Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33685361›Full record

ArticleChild neuropsychology : a journal on normal and abnormal development in childhood and adolescence2021

NIH Toolbox executive function measures with developmental extensions: Reliability and validity with preschoolers in emergency housing.

Rebecca Distefano, Aria E Fiat, Jillian S Merrick, Jerry Slotkin, Philip David Zelazo, Stephanie M Carlson, Ann S Masten

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Child neuropsychology : a journal on normal and abnormal development in childhood and adolescence, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A short executive functioning questionnaire in the context of early childhood screening: psychometric properties.Child neuropsychology : a journal on normal and abnormal development in childhood and adolescence · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. How do 3-year-olds do on the NIH Toolbox Cognitive Battery?Child neuropsychology : a journal on normal and abnormal development in childhood and adolescence · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rebecca DistefanoTeachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7536-4568
Aria E FiatBehavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Jillian S MerrickDepartment of Psychology, University of Denver, Denver, CO, USA.
Jerry SlotkinCenter for Health Assessment Research and Translation, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.
Philip David ZelazoInstitute of Child Development, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, MN, USA.
Stephanie M CarlsonInstitute of Child Development, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, MN, USA.
Ann S MastenInstitute of Child Development, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, MN, USA.

Funding

The ECHO Measurement Core: A Framework and Resource for Assessing Environmental Exposure and Child HealthU24OD023319 · OD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI Courtney K Blackwell, RICHARD GERSHON · 2016 to 2026
$43.7M
NIH HHS U24 OD023319
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research has shown that executive function (EF) skills are associated with resilience in preschoolers experiencing risk and adversity, but these studies have typically relied on large batteries of tasks to measure children's EF skills. There is a need for brief, reliable EF assessments that can be used in the field with diverse young children. The current study assessed the validity and test-retest reliability of two tablet-based EF tasks from the NIH Toolbox: The Dimensional Change Card Sort (DCCS) and the Flanker Inhibitory Control and Attention Test, each with a developmental extension (Dext) that is triggered when a child struggles with the standardized versions. Dext versions include easier levels intended to improve task accessibility for younger and disadvantaged children. Eighty-six preschoolers residing in emergency housing participated in two study sessions about one week apart, completing tablet-based DCCS-Dext and Flanker-Dext tasks, along with a table-top EF task (Peg-Tapping) and measures of vocabulary and numeracy. The majority of participants triggered the Dext portion of the DCCS and almost half triggered the Dext portion of the Flanker, underscoring the need for extensions of the Toolbox EF tasks to lower the floor of these measures. The Dext EF measures were positively associated with Peg-Tapping, after controlling for age and vocabulary, indicating construct validity. They were also correlated with math achievement, suggesting criterion validity. DCCS-Dext and Flanker-Dext showed moderate test-retest reliability after one week. Together, these findings demonstrate the value of developmental extensions for assessing EF skills among children experiencing risk and adversity.

Indexed as

Executive FunctionHousingAttentionChildChild, PreschoolHumansNeuropsychological TestsReproducibility of ResultsEarly childhoodexecutive function measuresrisk and adversitytest-retest reliabilityvalidity

Identifiers

PMID33685361
PMCPMC8282650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.