Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33685234›Full record

Trial reportJournal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics : the official journal of the Association for Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics2021

Assessing the Clinical Requirement of 2.5% Phenylephrine for Diagnostic Pupil Examination.

Junsang Cho, Brent Bruck, James C Liu, Susan M Culican

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics : the official journal of the Association for Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 55% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Radiometric and safety assessment of a 'low-level red-light' myopia control device.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Junsang ChoUniversity of Missouri, School of Medicine, Columbia, Missouri, USA.
Brent BruckDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
James C LiuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Duke University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Susan M CulicanDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Neurosciences, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Duke Raleigh Hospital · USUniversity of Minnesota Medical Center · USUniversity of Missouri · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnesthetics, LocalDiagnostic Techniques, OphthalmologicalDrug InteractionsDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMydriaticsOphthalmic SolutionsOutcome Assessment, Health CarePhenylephrinePropoxycaineProspective StudiesAnesthetics, LocalMydriaticsOphthalmic SolutionsPhenylephrinePropoxycaineproxymetacaineTropicamideclinical utilitydilating agenteye examinationphenylephrinetropicamide

Identifiers

PMID33685234
PMCPMC8215398
OpenAlexW3135539511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.