Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33684303›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of radiology2021

Differentiating uterine sarcoma from leiomyoma: BET

Janette Smith, Jeries Paolo Zawaideh, Hilal Sahin, Susan Freeman, Helen Bolton, Helen Clare Addley

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Preoperative differential diagnosis - uterine sarcoma or myoma?Przeglad menopauzalny = Menopause review · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Janette SmithDepartment of Radiology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Jeries Paolo ZawaidehDepartment of Radiology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Hilal SahinDepartment of Radiology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Susan FreemanDepartment of Radiology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Helen BoltonDepartment of Gynaecological Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Helen Clare AddleyDepartment of Radiology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although rare, uterine sarcoma is a diagnosis that no one wants to miss. Often benign leiomyomas (fibroids) and uterine sarcomas can be differentiated due to the typical low T2 signal intensity contents and well-defined appearances of benign leiomyomas compared to the suspicious appearances of sarcomas presenting as large uterine masses with irregular outlines and intermediate T2 signal intensity together with possible features of secondary spread. The problem is when these benign lesions are atypical causing suspicious imaging features. This article provides a review of the current literature on imaging features of atypical fibroids and uterine sarcomas with an aide-memoire BET

Indexed as

Contrast MediaDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansImage EnhancementLeiomyomaMagnetic Resonance ImagingSarcomaUterine NeoplasmsUterusContrast Media

Identifiers

PMID33684303
PMCPMC9327746
OpenAlexW3135378813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.