Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33684168›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2021

Real-life evaluation of histologic scores for Ulcerative Colitis in remission.

Christian Børde Arkteg, Sveinung Wergeland Sørbye, Lene Buhl Riis, Stig Manfred Dalen, Jon Florholmen, Rasmus Goll

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Saudi Arabia consensus guidance for the diagnosis and management of adults with inflammatory bowel disease.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christian Børde ArktegResearch Group Gastroenterology Nutrition, Institute of Clinical Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-4787-7603
Sveinung Wergeland SørbyeDepartment of Clinical Pathology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-8250-3992
Lene Buhl RiisDepartment of Pathology, Herlev-Gentofte Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.
Stig Manfred DalenDepartment of Clinical Pathology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Jon FlorholmenResearch Group Gastroenterology Nutrition, Institute of Clinical Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Rasmus GollResearch Group Gastroenterology Nutrition, Institute of Clinical Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-4375-0509

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHistological evaluation of ulcerative colitis (UC) patients has been debated ever since the first description of the disease and its role in follow-up has never been fully established. Recent evidence suggests an added benefit in accuracy when evaluating if the patient is in remission. Unfortunately, there are several different histological indices, and it is difficult to compare outcomes where different scores are applied. Histopathological evaluation is prone to subjective biases, despite the use of indices. In addition, these indices are developed by expert IBD pathologist, but applied at large, by general pathologist. Therefore, we evaluated the three most applied histological indices for UC on samples from patients in remission to compare test qualities and estimate their usefulness to identify remission by both general and GI specialized pathologist.

methodMucosal biopsies from 41 UC patients in clinical and endoscopic remission were collected as part of a larger study on UC. Three pathologists blinded to the patients' clinical status evaluated them using Geboes score (GS), Nancy Index (NI) and Robarts Histopathological Index (RHI). We calculated the agreement between the pathologists using Inter-class correlation (ICC) and visualized it with ICC-plots and Bland-Altman plots. Association between clinical factors and histological category were analysed by Fisher's exact test.

resultsThe ICC value for GS, RHI and NI were 0.85, 0.73 and 0.70 respectively. The limits of agreement were ±6.1, ±4.0 and ±1.4, for GS, RHI and NI, respectively. Mayo endoscopic subgrade and UC clinical score did not show association with any histological scores. Despite clinical and endoscopic remission 7-35% of the patients displayed histological inflammation on a level classified as active disease, depending on the index and cut-off.

conclusionA substantial amount of UC patients in clinical and endoscopic remission display inflammation on a histological level, but the ability to classify these patients accurately and consistently could be improved.

Indexed as

AdultBiopsyColitis, UlcerativeHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRemission InductionSeverity of Illness Index

Identifiers

PMID33684168
PMCPMC7939352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.