Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33684110›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2021

Zika-related adverse outcomes in a cohort of pregnant women with rash in Pernambuco, Brazil.

Ricardo Arraes de Alencar Ximenes, Demócrito de Barros Miranda-Filho, Ulisses Ramos Montarroyos, Celina Maria Turchi Martelli, Thalia Velho Barreto de Araújo, Elizabeth Brickley, Maria de Fátima Pessoa Militão de Albuquerque, Wayner Vieira Souza, Liana O Ventura, Camila V Ventura and 19 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Still on the Brazilian Response to the Microcephaly Epidemic: A Meta-analysis of 1,548 Pregnant Women from 13 Cohorts to Evaluate the Risk of Adverse Outcomes.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Reverse Genetics of Zika Virus Using a Bacterial Artificial Chromosome.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. WouldViruses · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Ricardo Arraes de Alencar XimenesDepartamento de Medicina Tropical, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9951-8840
Demócrito de Barros Miranda-FilhoFaculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2537-1476
Ulisses Ramos MontarroyosInstituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8967-5693
Celina Maria Turchi MartelliDepartamento de Saúde Coletiva, Instituto Aggeu Magalhães, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2491-0688
Thalia Velho Barreto de AraújoDepartamento de Medicina Social, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9956-4145
Elizabeth BrickleyDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0280-2288
Maria de Fátima Pessoa Militão de AlbuquerqueDepartamento de Saúde Coletiva, Instituto Aggeu Magalhães, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Wayner Vieira SouzaDepartamento de Saúde Coletiva, Instituto Aggeu Magalhães, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Liana O VenturaDepartamento de Oftalmologia, Fundação Altino Ventura, Recife, Pernambuco, Brasil.
Camila V VenturaDepartamento de Oftalmologia, Fundação Altino Ventura, Recife, Pernambuco, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-2927-4684
Adriana L GoisDepartamento de Oftalmologia, Fundação Altino Ventura, Recife, Pernambuco, Brasil.
Mariana C LealDepartamento de Cirurgia, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco Brazil.
Danielle Maria da Silva OliveiraUTI Pediátrica, Hospital Universitário Oswaldo Cruz, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3933-430X
Sophie Helena EickmannDepartamento Materno-Infantil, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6523-2107
Maria Durce C G CarvalhoDepartamento de Neurologia, Hospital Universitário Oswaldo Cruz, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Paula F S da SilvaDepartamento de Neurologia, Hospital Universitário Oswaldo Cruz, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9475-4732
Maria Angela Wanderley RochaFaculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6394-5739
Regina Coeli Ferreira RamosDepartamento de Infectologia Pediátrica, Hospital Universitário Oswaldo Cruz, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Sinval Pinto Brandão-FilhoDepartamento de Imunologia, Instituto Aggeu Maglhães, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3768-2810
Marli Tenorio CordeiroLaboratório de Virologia e Terapia Experimental, Instituto Aggeu Maglhães, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Luciana Caroline Albuquerque BezerraSecretaria Executiva da Vigilância em Saúde, Secretaria de Saúde de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6074-6072
George DimechSecretaria Executiva da Vigilância em Saúde, Secretaria de Saúde de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Sandra ValongueiroDepartamento de Medicina Social, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8532-5346
Pedro PiresDepartamento Materno-Infantil, Universidade de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1970-5321
Priscila Mayrelle da Silva CastanhaPrograma de Pós-graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Universidade de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1220-5308
Rafael DhaliaLaboratório de Virologia e Terapia Experimental, Instituto Aggeu Maglhães, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Ernesto Torres Azevedo Marques-JúniorLaboratório de Virologia e Terapia Experimental, Instituto Aggeu Maglhães, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3826-9358
Laura C RodriguesDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Microcephaly Epidemic Research Group (MERG)
Universidade de Pernambuco · BRUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco · BRHospital Universitário Oswaldo Cruz · BRFundação Altino Ventura · BRFundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_15088Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 107779/Z/15/ZWellcome Trust 201870/Z/16/ZWellcome Trust 205377/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile Zika virus (ZIKV) is now widely recognized as a teratogen, the frequency and full spectrum of adverse outcomes of congenital ZIKV infection remains incompletely understood.

methodsParticipants in the MERG cohort of pregnant women with rash, recruited from the surveillance system from December/2015-June/2017. Exposure definition was based on a combination of longitudinal data from molecular, serologic (IgM and IgG3) and plaque reduction neutralization tests for ZIKV. Children were evaluated by a team of clinical specialists and by transfontanelle ultrasound and were classified as having microcephaly and/or other signs/symptoms consistent with congenital Zika syndrome (CZS). Risks of adverse outcomes were quantified according to the relative evidence of a ZIKV infection in pregnancy.

findings376 women had confirmed and suspected exposure to ZIKV. Among evaluable children born to these mothers, 20% presented with an adverse outcome compatible with exposure to ZIKV during pregnancy. The absolute risk of microcephaly was 2.9% (11/376), of calcifications and/or ventriculomegaly was 7.2% (13/180), of additional neurologic alterations was 5.3% (13/245), of ophthalmologic abnormalities was 7% (15/214), and of dysphagia was 1.8% (4/226). Less than 1% of the children experienced abnormalities across all of the domains simultaneously. Interpretation: Although approximately one-fifth of children with confirmed and suspected exposure to ZIKV in pregnancy presented with at least one abnormality compatible with CZS, the manifestations presented more frequently in isolation than in combination. Due to the rare nature of some outcomes and the possibility of later manifestations, large scale individual participant data meta-analysis and the long-term evaluation of children are imperative to identify the full spectrum of this syndrome and to plan actions to reduce damages.

Indexed as

Pregnancy OutcomeAdultBrazilCentral Nervous System DiseasesFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousZika VirusZika Virus Infection

Identifiers

PMID33684110
PMCPMC7971861
OpenAlexW3134344868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.