Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33684054›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2021

COVID-19 Discourse on Twitter in Four Asian Countries: Case Study of Risk Communication.

Sungkyu Park, Sungwon Han, Jeongwook Kim, Mir Majid Molaie, Hoang Dieu Vu, Karandeep Singh, Jiyoung Han, Wonjae Lee, Meeyoung Cha

Erratum issuedAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Infodemics during era of COVID-19 pandemic: A review of literature.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Structural Topic Model Analysis of Mask-Wearing Issue Using International News Big Data.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sungkyu Park *Data Science Group, Institute for Basic Science, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2607-2120
Sungwon Han *Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-1129-760X
Jeongwook Kim *Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8300-5055
Mir Majid MolaieKorea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8063-7383
Hoang Dieu VuElectrical and Electronic Engineering, Phenikaa University, Hanoi, Vietnam.ORCID 0000-0002-8732-8302
Karandeep SinghData Science Group, Institute for Basic Science, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-6030-1663
Jiyoung HanKorea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4177-2889
Wonjae LeeKorea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9584-2101
Meeyoung ChaData Science Group, Institute for Basic Science, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-4085-9648

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCOVID-19, caused by SARS-CoV-2, has led to a global pandemic. The World Health Organization has also declared an infodemic (ie, a plethora of information regarding COVID-19 containing both false and accurate information circulated on the internet). Hence, it has become critical to test the veracity of information shared online and analyze the evolution of discussed topics among citizens related to the pandemic.

objectiveThis research analyzes the public discourse on COVID-19. It characterizes risk communication patterns in four Asian countries with outbreaks at varying degrees of severity: South Korea, Iran, Vietnam, and India.

methodsWe collected tweets on COVID-19 from four Asian countries in the early phase of the disease outbreak from January to March 2020. The data set was collected by relevant keywords in each language, as suggested by locals. We present a method to automatically extract a time-topic cohesive relationship in an unsupervised fashion based on natural language processing. The extracted topics were evaluated qualitatively based on their semantic meanings.

resultsThis research found that each government's official phases of the epidemic were not well aligned with the degree of public attention represented by the daily tweet counts. Inspired by the issue-attention cycle theory, the presented natural language processing model can identify meaningful transition phases in the discussed topics among citizens. The analysis revealed an inverse relationship between the tweet count and topic diversity.

conclusionsThis paper compares similarities and differences of pandemic-related social media discourse in Asian countries. We observed multiple prominent peaks in the daily tweet counts across all countries, indicating multiple issue-attention cycles. Our analysis identified which topics the public concentrated on; some of these topics were related to misinformation and hate speech. These findings and the ability to quickly identify key topics can empower global efforts to fight against an infodemic during a pandemic.

Indexed as

CommunicationCOVID-19HumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Social MediacoronavirusCOVID-19infodemicinfodemiologyinfoveillancelatent Dirichlet allocationrisk communicationtopic modelingtopic phase detectionTwitter

Identifiers

PMID33684054
PMCPMC8108572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.