ArticleMicrobial biotechnology2021
Different co-occurring bacteria enhance or decrease the growth of the microalga Nannochloropsis sp. CCAP211/78.
Article in Microbial biotechnology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Taxonomic composition and ecophysiology of resident bacteria associated with marine phytoplankton.Nature ecology & evolution · 2026Article
- Marine Microalgae-Microorganism Co-Cultures: An Insight intoFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Key species drive community and functional stability of segment-specific gut microbiomes after the swimming crab molting.iMetaOmics · 2025Article
- 3D Bioprinting of Microbial-based Living Materials for Advanced Energy and Environmental Applications.Chem & bio engineering · 2024Review
- Freshwater microalgae Nannochloropsis limnetica for the production of β-galactosidase from whey powder.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Beneficial rhizosphere bacteria provides active assistance in resistingFrontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- The Assembly Process of Free-Living and Particle-Attached Bacterial Communities in Shrimp-Rearing Waters: The Overwhelming Influence of Nutrient Factors Relative to Microalgal Inoculation.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- A closer look into the microbiome of microalgal cultures.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Lab-scale photobioreactor systems: principles, applications, and scalability.Bioprocess and biosystems engineering · 2022Review
- The seaweed holobiont: from microecology to biotechnological applications.Microbial biotechnology · 2022Review
- Long-Term Stability of Bacterial Associations in a Microcosm ofFrontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Synthetic algal-bacteria consortia for space-efficient microalgal growth in a simple hydrogel system.Journal of applied phycology · 2021Article
- Different co-occurring bacteria enhance or decrease the growth of the microalga Nannochloropsis sp. CCAP211/78.Microbial biotechnology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Marine photosynthetic microalgae are ubiquitously associated with bacteria in nature. However, the influence of these bacteria on algal cultures in bioreactors is still largely unknown. In this study, eighteen different bacterial strains were isolated from cultures of Nannochloropsis sp. CCAP211/78 in two outdoor pilot-scale tubular photobioreactors. The majority of isolates was affiliated with the classes Alphaproteobacteria and Flavobacteriia. To assess the impact of the eighteen strains on the growth of Nannochloropsis sp. CCAP211/78, 24-well plates coupled with custom-made LED boxes were used to simultaneously compare replicate axenic microalgal cultures with addition of individual bacterial isolates. Co-culturing of Nannochloropsis sp. CCAP211/78 with these strains demonstrated distinct responses, which shows that the technique we developed is an efficient method for screening the influence of harmful/beneficial bacteria. Two of the tested strains, namely a strain of Maritalea porphyrae (DMSP31) and a Labrenzia aggregata strain (YP26), significantly enhanced microalgal growth with a 14% and 12% increase of the chlorophyll concentration, respectively, whereas flavobacterial strain YP206 greatly inhibited the growth of the microalga with 28% reduction of the chlorophyll concentration. Our study suggests that algal production systems represent a 'natural' source to isolate and study microorganisms that can either benefit or harm algal cultures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.