Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33683666›Full record

ArticleNetherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation2021

The first multicentre study on coronary anomalies in the Netherlands: MuSCAT.

C J Koppel, B W Driesen, R J de Winter, A E van den Bosch, R van Kimmenade, L J Wagenaar, J W Jukema, M G Hazekamp, F van der Kley, M R M Jongbloed and 10 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Editorial: Coronary Artery Anomalies: A 2020 Review.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

C J KoppelDepartment of Cardiology, CAHAL, Centre for Congenital Heart Disease Amsterdam-Leiden, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
B W DriesenDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
R J de WinterDepartment of Cardiology, CAHAL, Centre for Congenital Heart Disease Amsterdam-Leiden, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, location AMC, Amsterdam Zuidoost, The Netherlands.
A E van den BoschDepartment of Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
R van KimmenadeDepartment of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
L J WagenaarThorax Centre Twente, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
J W JukemaDepartment of Cardiology, CAHAL, Centre for Congenital Heart Disease Amsterdam-Leiden, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
M G HazekampDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
F van der KleyDepartment of Cardiology, CAHAL, Centre for Congenital Heart Disease Amsterdam-Leiden, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
M R M JongbloedDepartment of Cardiology, CAHAL, Centre for Congenital Heart Disease Amsterdam-Leiden, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
P KièsDepartment of Cardiology, CAHAL, Centre for Congenital Heart Disease Amsterdam-Leiden, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
A D EgorovaDepartment of Cardiology, CAHAL, Centre for Congenital Heart Disease Amsterdam-Leiden, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
D B H VerheijenDepartment of Cardiology, CAHAL, Centre for Congenital Heart Disease Amsterdam-Leiden, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
P DammanDepartment of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
P H SchoofDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
J WilschutDepartment of Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
M StoelThorax Centre Twente, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
R G H SpeekenbrinkThorax Centre Twente, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
M VoskuilDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
H W VliegenDepartment of Cardiology, CAHAL, Centre for Congenital Heart Disease Amsterdam-Leiden, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands. h.w.vliegen@lumc.nl.
Leiden University Medical Center · NLMedisch Spectrum Twente · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLErasmus University Rotterdam · NLLeiden University · NLRadboud University Medical Center · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent guidelines on coronary anomalies are primarily based on expert consensus and a limited number of trials. A gold standard for diagnosis and a consensus on the treatment strategy in this patient group are lacking, especially for patients with an anomalous origin of a coronary artery from the opposite sinus of Valsalva (ACAOS) with an interarterial course.

aimTo provide evidence-substantiated recommendations for diagnostic work-up, treatment and follow-up of patients with anomalous coronary arteries.

methodsA clinical care pathway for patients with ACAOS was established by six Dutch centres. Prospectively included patients undergo work-up according to protocol using computed tomography (CT) angiography, ischaemia detection, echocardiography and coronary angiography with intracoronary measurements to assess anatomical and physiological characteristics of the ACAOS. Surgical and functional follow-up results are evaluated by CT angiography, ischaemia detection and a quality-of-life questionnaire. Patient inclusion for the first multicentre study on coronary anomalies in the Netherlands started in 2020 and will continue for at least 3 years with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. For patients with a right or left coronary artery originating from the pulmonary artery and coronary arteriovenous fistulas a registry is maintained.

resultsPrimary outcomes are: (cardiac) death, myocardial ischaemia attributable to the ACAOS, re-intervention after surgery and intervention after initially conservative treatment. The influence of work-up examinations on treatment choice is also evaluated.

conclusionsStructural evidence for the appropriate management of patients with coronary anomalies, especially (interarterial) ACAOS, is lacking. By means of a structured care pathway in a multicentre setting, we aim to provide an evidence-based strategy for the diagnostic evaluation and treatment of this patient group.

Indexed as

Anomalous coronary artery from the opposite sinus of ValsalvaAnomalous coronary artery from the pulmonary arteryCoronary anomaliesCoronary arteriovenous fistulaMulticentre study

Identifiers

PMID33683666
PMCPMC8160042
OpenAlexW3135356453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.