Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33683639›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2021

Predictive factors of mortality in open abdomen for abdominal sepsis: a retrospective cohort study on 113 patients.

Dario Tartaglia, Jacopo Nicolò Marin, Alice Maria Nicoli, Andrea De Palma, Martina Picchi, Serena Musetti, Camilla Cremonini, Stefano Salvadori, Federico Coccolini, Massimo Chiarugi

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dario TartagliaEmergency Surgery Department and Trauma Center, University of Pisa, New Santa Chiara Hospital, Via Paradisa 2, 56124, Pisa, Italy. dario.tartaglia@unipi.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1615-3370
Jacopo Nicolò MarinEmergency Surgery Department and Trauma Center, University of Pisa, New Santa Chiara Hospital, Via Paradisa 2, 56124, Pisa, Italy.
Alice Maria NicoliEmergency Surgery Department and Trauma Center, University of Pisa, New Santa Chiara Hospital, Via Paradisa 2, 56124, Pisa, Italy.
Andrea De PalmaEmergency Surgery Department and Trauma Center, University of Pisa, New Santa Chiara Hospital, Via Paradisa 2, 56124, Pisa, Italy.
Martina PicchiEmergency Surgery Department and Trauma Center, University of Pisa, New Santa Chiara Hospital, Via Paradisa 2, 56124, Pisa, Italy.
Serena MusettiEmergency Surgery Department and Trauma Center, University of Pisa, New Santa Chiara Hospital, Via Paradisa 2, 56124, Pisa, Italy.
Camilla CremoniniEmergency Surgery Department and Trauma Center, University of Pisa, New Santa Chiara Hospital, Via Paradisa 2, 56124, Pisa, Italy.
Stefano SalvadoriConsiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche Area della Ricerca di Pisa, Pisa, Toscana, Italy.
Federico CoccoliniEmergency Surgery Department and Trauma Center, University of Pisa, New Santa Chiara Hospital, Via Paradisa 2, 56124, Pisa, Italy.
Massimo ChiarugiEmergency Surgery Department and Trauma Center, University of Pisa, New Santa Chiara Hospital, Via Paradisa 2, 56124, Pisa, Italy.
University of Pisa · ITBologna Research Area · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past few years, the open abdomen (OA) as a part of Damage Control Surgery (DCS) has been introduced as a surgical strategy with the intent to reduce the mortality of patients with severe abdominal sepsis. Aims of our study were to analyze the OA effects on patients with abdominal sepsis and identify predictive factors of mortality. Patients admitted to our institution with abdominal sepsis requiring OA from 2010 to 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Primary outcomes were mortality, morbidity and definitive fascial closure (DFC). Comparison between groups was made via univariate and multivariate analyses. On 1474 patients operated for abdominal sepsis, 113 (7.6%) underwent OA. Male gender accounted for 52.2% of cases. Mean age was 68.1 ± 14.3 years. ASA score was > 2 in 87.9%. Mean BMI, APACHE II score and Mannheim Peritonitis Index were 26.4 ± 4.9, 15.3 ± 6.3, and 22.6 ± 7.3, respectively. A negative pressure wound system technique was used in 47% of the cases. Overall, mortality was 43.4%, morbidity 76.6%, and DFC rate was 97.8%. Entero-atmospheric fistula rate was 2.2%. At multivariate analysis, APACHE II score (OR 1.18; 95% CI 1.05-1.32; p = 0.005), Frailty Clinical Scale (OR 4.66; 95% CI 3.19-6.12; p < 0.0001) and ASA grade IV (OR 7.86; 95% CI 2.18-28.27; p = 0.002) were significantly associated with mortality. OA seems to be a safe and reliable treatment for critically ill patients with severe abdominal sepsis. Nonetheless, in these patients, co-morbidity and organ failure remain the major obstacles to a better prognosis.

Indexed as

Abdominal CavityAbdominal Wound Closure TechniquesNegative-Pressure Wound TherapySepsisAbdomenAgedHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesAbdominal sepsisDamage controlMorbidityMortalityNegative pressureOpen abdomen

Identifiers

PMID33683639
PMCPMC8500907
OpenAlexW3135625508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.