Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33683615›Full record

ArticleCJEM2021

Virtual care in the pediatric emergency department: a new way of doing business?

Sarah Reid, Maala Bhatt, Roger Zemek, Sandy Tse

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in CJEM, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Pediatric capacity crisis: A framework and strategies to prepare for a pediatric surge.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2024
    Article
  15. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Critical evaluation of novel health system interventions is essential.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sarah ReidDepartments of Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada. sreid@cheo.on.ca.
Maala BhattDivision of Emergency Medicine, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, 401 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L1, Canada.
Roger ZemekDepartments of Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Sandy TseDepartments of Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo understand the feasibility, utilization rate, and satisfaction of the first Virtual Pediatric ED (V-PED) in Canada.

methodsWe conducted a prospective cohort study examining the feasibility and impact of virtual care as an adjunct to in-person emergency care at a tertiary pediatric hospital from May to July 2020. Children (< 18 years) from Ontario and Quebec seeking V-PED care were included. A secure, encrypted, video platform within the hospital's electronic medical record was used. Caregivers self-determined appropriateness of V-PED using a standardized online triage questionnaire to request their appointment. The V-PED is directly launched from the patient's chart and the family joins the portal via hyperlink. Outcome measures included the number of V-PED visits, hospital admission rates, and caregiver satisfaction using a 10-item voluntary post-visit online survey.

resultsA total of 1036 V-PED visits were seen of which 176 (17.0%) were referred for further in-person ED assessment, and 8 (0.8%) required hospital admission. Of the 107 completing patient experience surveys (10% response), most respondents (69%) endorsed they "very likely" or "definitely" would have presented in-person to the ED if V-PED were unavailable. Overall satisfaction was rated as excellent (9 or 10 out of 10) in 87% of respondents.

conclusionOur novel V-PED is feasible, has high caregiver satisfaction, and can reduce the burden of in-person ED visits. Future work must ensure the safety of emergency virtual care and examine how to increase capacity and integrate V-PED within traditional emergency medicine.

Indexed as

Referral and ConsultationVirtual RealityAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolEmergenciesEmergency Service, HospitalFeasibility StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHospitals, PediatricHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleOntarioCOVID-19Emergency medicinePandemicPediatricVirtual care

Identifiers

PMID33683615
PMCPMC7747474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.