ReviewInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2021
Multimodal 3D ultrasound and CT in image-guided spinal surgery: public database and new registration algorithms.
Review in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- US & MR/CT Image Fusion with Markerless Skin Registration: A Proof of Concept.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- Three-Dimensional Multi-Modality Registration for Orthopaedics and Cardiovascular Settings: State-of-the-Art and Clinical Applications.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Assessment of thoracic spinal curvatures in static postures using spatially tracked 3D ultrasound volumes: a proof-of-concept study.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2023Article
- Cross-Modality Registration using Bone Surface Pointcloud for Robotic Ultrasound-Guided Spine Surgery.Journal of medical robotics researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAccurate multimodal registration of intraoperative ultrasound (US) and preoperative computed tomography (CT) is a challenging problem. Construction of public datasets of US and CT images can accelerate the development of such image registration techniques. This can help ensure the accuracy and safety of spinal surgeries using image-guided surgery systems where an image registration is employed. In addition, we present two algorithms to register US and CT images.
methodsWe present three different datasets of vertebrae with corresponding CT, US, and simulated US images. For each of the two latter datasets, we also provide 16 landmark pairs of matching structures between the CT and US images and performed fiducial registration to acquire a silver standard for assessing image registration. Besides, we proposed two patch-based rigid image registration algorithms, one based on normalized cross-correlation (NCC) and the other based on correlation ratio (CR) to register misaligned CT and US images.
resultsThe CT and corresponding US images of the proposed database were pre-processed and misaligned with different error intervals, resulting in 6000 registration problems solved using both NCC and CR methods. Our results show that the methods were successful in aligning the pre-processed CT and US images by decreasing the warping index.
conclusionsThe database provides a resource for evaluating image registration techniques. The simulated data have two applications. First, they provide the gold standard ground-truth which is difficult to obtain with ex vivo and in vivo data for validating US-CT registration methods. Second, the simulated US images can be used to validate real-time US simulation methods. Besides, the proposed image registration techniques can be useful for developing methods in clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33683544What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.