Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33683513›Full record

ReviewBiomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology2021

Mechanical homeostasis in tissue equivalents: a review.

Jonas F Eichinger, Lea J Haeusel, Daniel Paukner, Roland C Aydin, Jay D Humphrey, Christian J Cyron

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Development of anMatrix biology plus · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Real-time single-molecule observation of incipient collagen fibrillogenesis and remodeling.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jonas F EichingerInstitute for Computational Mechanics, Technical University of Munich, 85748, Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1360-2137
Lea J HaeuselInstitute for Computational Mechanics, Technical University of Munich, 85748, Munich, Germany.
Daniel PauknerInstitute of Continuum and Materials Mechanics, Hamburg University of Technology, 21073, Hamburg, Germany.
Roland C AydinInstitute of Material Systems Modeling, Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht, 21502, Geesthacht, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9542-9146
Jay D HumphreyDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1011-2025
Christian J CyronInstitute of Continuum and Materials Mechanics, Hamburg University of Technology, 21073, Hamburg, Germany. christian.cyron@tuhh.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8264-0885

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 257981274Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 386349077
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is substantial evidence that growth and remodeling of load bearing soft biological tissues is to a large extent controlled by mechanical factors. Mechanical homeostasis, which describes the natural tendency of such tissues to establish, maintain, or restore a preferred mechanical state, is thought to be one mechanism by which such control is achieved across multiple scales. Yet, many questions remain regarding what promotes or prevents homeostasis. Tissue equivalents, such as collagen gels seeded with living cells, have become an important tool to address these open questions under well-defined, though limited, conditions. This article briefly reviews the current state of research in this area. It summarizes, categorizes, and compares experimental observations from the literature that focus on the development of tension in tissue equivalents. It focuses primarily on uniaxial and biaxial experimental studies, which are well-suited for quantifying interactions between mechanics and biology. The article concludes with a brief discussion of key questions for future research in this field.

Indexed as

HomeostasisOrgan SpecificityAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaCollagenExtracellular MatrixFibroblastsHumansCollagenGrowth and remodelingMechanical homeostasisMechanobiologyMechanoregulationMechanosensationMechanotransductionTensional homeostasis

Identifiers

PMID33683513
PMCPMC8154823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.