Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33683507›Full record

ArticleThe European physical journal. E, Soft matter2021

Modelling the motion of organelles in an elongated cell via the coordination of heterogeneous drift-diffusion and long-range transport.

Congping Lin, Peter Ashwin, Gero Steinberg

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The European physical journal. E, Soft matter, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Congping LinSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China. congpinglin@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9723-8880
Peter AshwinDepartment of Mathematics, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7330-4951
Gero SteinbergSchool of Biosciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H019774/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J009903/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cellular distribution of organelles in living cells is achieved via a variety of transport mechanisms, including directed motion, mediated by molecular motors along microtubules (MTs), and diffusion which is predominantly heterogeneous in space. In this paper, we introduce a model for particle transport in elongated cells that couples poleward drift, long-range bidirectional transport and diffusion with spatial heterogeneity in a three-dimensional space. Using stochastic simulations and analysis of a related population model, we find parameter regions where the three-dimensional model can be reduced to a coupled one-dimensional model or even a one-dimensional scalar model. We explore the efficiency with which individual model components can overcome drift towards one of the cell poles to reach an approximately even distribution. In particular, we find that if lateral movement is well mixed, then increasing the binding ability of particles to MTs is an efficient way to overcome a poleward drift, whereas if lateral motion is not well mixed, then increasing the axial diffusivity away from MTs becomes an efficient way to overcome the poleward drift. Our three-dimensional model provides a new tool that will help to understand the mechanisms by which eukaryotic cells organize their organelles in an elongated cell, and in particular when the one-dimensional models are applicable.

Indexed as

BasidiomycotaComputer SimulationDiffusionMicrotubulesModels, BiologicalMotionOrganelles

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.