ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2021
Analysis of the agreement between colposcopic impression and histopathological diagnosis of cervical biopsy in a single tertiary center of Chengdu.
Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07012356 (Does The Type of Hr-HPV and Multiple HPV Carrier Status Increase The Effectiveness of The Colposcopy in Diagnosing Preinvasive Lesions Using The Swede Score and The 2011 IFCPC Nomenclature?), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Does The Type of Hr-HPV and Multiple HPV Carrier Status Increase The Effectiveness of The Colposcopy in Diagnosing Preinvasive Lesions Using The Swede Score and The 2011 IFCPC Nomenclature?
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Machine learning-assisted SERS for rapid and accurate early screening of cervical cancer.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Analysis of Pathological Discrepancies Between Colposcopic Biopsy and Conization in Cytology-Positive Cervical Lesions.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Higher Diagnostic Accuracy of an AI Model for Colposcopy Compared With Conventional and Digital Colposcopic Evaluation.Journal of lower genital tract disease · 2026Article
- Performance of artificial intelligence for diagnosing cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
- A Systematic Review of the Application of Artificial Intelligence in Colposcopy: Diagnostic Accuracy for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Cervical Cancer.Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology · 2025Review
- Analysis of factors affecting the accuracy of colposcopic diagnosis of cervical lesions: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Application of EfficientNet-B0 and GRU-based deep learning on classifying the colposcopy diagnosis of precancerous cervical lesions.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- Artificial intelligence in colposcopic examination: A promising tool to assist junior colposcopists.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Evaluating the Feasibility of Machine-Learning-Based Predictive Models for Precancerous Cervical Lesions in Patients Referred for Colposcopy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Improving colposcopic accuracy for cervical precancer detection: a retrospective multicenter study in China.BMC cancer · 2022Observational
- Assessing colposcopic accuracy for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion detection: a retrospective, cohort study.BMC women's health · 2022Article
- Which is the best management for women with normal cervical cytologic findings despite positivity for non-16/18 high risk human papillomaviruses?Frontiers in public health · 2022Review
- Optimizing the Detection of Occult Cervical Cancer: A Prospective Multicentre Study in China.International journal of women's health · 2021Article
- The Infection Status and Distribution of hrHPV in Cervical Lesions Among Overweight Women Referred for Colposcopy: A Cross-Sectional Study.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this retrospective study was to analyze the agreement between colposcopic impression and histopathological diagnosis of cervical biopsy.
methodsThe medical records of patients underwent a colposcopy-guided cervical biopsy at Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital between January 2017 and January 2019 were collected, including age, menopausal status, cervical cytology and human papillomavirus (HPV) test results, type of transformation zone, colposcopic diagnosis and histopathological outcomes of cervical biopsy. Colposcopy was carried out using 2011 colposcopic terminology of International Federation for Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy (IFCPC). Related variables were analyzed.
resultsA total of 495 patients were collected in this study. The perfect agreement between colposcopic impression and histopathological diagnosis was 46.9%, and the strength of agreement with kappa value was 0.283 (P < 0.001), and the agreement within 1 grade was 93.5%. Positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), sensitivity, specificity, false-positive rate and false-negative rate of detecting HSIL or more (HSIL +) were 93.1%, 57.8%, 80.9%, 93.9%, 6.1% and 45.3%, respectively. Colposcopic diagnosis more often underestimated (43.2%) [especially in HSIL (59.3%) and carcinoma (70.7%) patients] than overestimated (9.9%) in cervical lesions. The results of cytology, HPV status, patients' age and different experiences of practitioners were the factors for under-diagnosis of HSIL + by colposcopy.
conclusionColposcopy is an excellent tool to estimate cervical high-grade lesion but is imprecise. Many factors can bias the diagnosis of colposcopy, especially the known results of cervical cytology and HPV. Precise diagnosis of cervical lesion should rely on the colposcopy-directed biopsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.