Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33683422›Full record

ArticleChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2021

Use of intra-operative stimulation of brainstem lesion target sites for frameless stereotactic biopsies.

Jason Labuschagne, Denis Mutyaba, Jacques Nel, Claudia Casieri

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Letter to the Editor regarding "Use of intra-operative stimulation of brainstem lesion target sites for frameless stereotactic biopsies".Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2021
    Article
  7. Response to letter to the editor regarding "Use of intra-operative stimulation of brainstem lesion target sites for frameless stereotactic biopsies."Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jason LabuschagneDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa. Jason.labuschagne@icloud.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6567-0131
Denis MutyabaDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Jacques NelJacques Nel and Associates, Atterbury Estate, Pretoria, South Africa.
Claudia CasieriDepartment of Neurophysiology, Nelson Mandela Children's Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFrameless stereotactic navigation is used to direct the trajectory and biopsy site of target lesions. We report on a novel intra-operative stimulating (IOS) probe that is integrated into a commercially available stereotactic biopsy needle with the rationale that stimulation of the intended biopsy site should predict functional tissue thus preventing inadvertent biopsy of eloquent tissue.

methodsPatients undergoing brainstem biopsies for atypical lesions were offered the additional stimulation procedure. The IOS probe was used to deliver stimulation in an attempt to determine the proximity of eloquent tissue. Once the desired location of the biopsy needle was achieved, the IOS probe was inserted down the centre of the biopsy needle and the stimulus applied. If no action potential was recorded, biopsies from four quadrants of the lesion were taken. If however a compound action potential was recorded, a new target was selected.

resultsNine patients had the biopsy and stimulation procedure performed. The median age was 36 months. A minimum of 8 samples were obtained from each patient. Biopsy material was adequate to obtain a diagnosis in all 9 patients. In 2 cases use of the device influenced the insertion trajectory or biopsy site. No patients experienced any complications directly attributable to either the biopsy procedure or application of the stimulation.

conclusionsUse of the IOS probe for intra-operative stimulation of the intended brainstem biopsy site was found to be safe and feasible. The addition of stimulation using the IOS probe can be done with minimal change in workflow.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsNeuronavigationBiopsyBrain StemChild, PreschoolHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalStereotaxic TechniquesBrainstem biopsyDIPGIONMMidline glioma

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.