Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33683420›Full record

ArticleUrolithiasis2021

Intraoperative cone beam computed tomography for detecting residual stones in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a feasibility study.

R A Kingma, M J H Voskamp, B H J Doornweerd, I J de Jong, S Roemeling

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Urolithiasis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

R A KingmaDepartment of Urology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, House Zip Code CB 62, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands. r.a.kingma@umcg.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1648-0419
M J H VoskampDepartment of Urology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, House Zip Code CB 62, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
B H J DoornweerdDepartment of Urology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, House Zip Code CB 62, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
I J de JongDepartment of Urology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, House Zip Code CB 62, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
S RoemelingDepartment of Urology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, House Zip Code CB 62, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
University Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) provides multiplanar cross-sectional imaging and three-dimensional reconstructions and can be used intraoperatively in a hybrid operating room. In this study, we investigated the feasibility of using a CBCT-scanner for detecting residual stones during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Intraoperative CBCT-scans were made during PCNL procedures from November 2018 until March 2019 in a university hospital. At the point where the urologist would have otherwise ended the procedure, a CBCT-scan was made to image any residual fragments that could not be detected by either nephroscopy or conventional C-arm fluoroscopy. Residual fragments that were visualized on the CBCT-scan were attempted to be extracted additionally. To evaluate the effect of this additional extraction, each CBCT-scan was compared with a regular follow-up CT-scan that was made 4 weeks postoperatively. A total of 19 procedures were analyzed in this study. The mean duration of performing the CBCT-scan, including preparation and interpretation, was 8 min. Additional stone extraction, if applicable, had a mean duration of 11 min. The mean effective dose per CBCT-scan was 7.25 mSv. Additional extraction of residual fragments as imaged on the CBCT-scan occurred in nine procedures (47%). Of the follow-up CT-scans, 63% showed a stone-free status as compared to 47% of the intraoperative CBCT-scans. We conclude that the use of CBCT for the detection of residual stones in PCNL is meaningful, safe, and feasible.

Indexed as

Kidney CalculiNephrolithotomy, PercutaneousCone-Beam Computed TomographyFeasibility StudiesHumansTomography, X-Ray ComputedCone beam computed tomography (CBCT)Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL)Residual fragmentsUrolithiasis

Identifiers

PMID33683420
PMCPMC8560674
OpenAlexW3135739311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.