ReviewDer Anaesthesist2021
[In-cabin rapid sequence induction : Experience from alpine air rescue on reduction of the prehospital time].
Review in Der Anaesthesist, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Major medical events in patients with acute coronary syndrome during helicopter emergency medical service operations.BMC emergency medicine · 2025Observational
- Management and outcome of patients with cardiac arrest after avalanche accidents in the Swiss Alps: A retrospective analysis.Resuscitation plus · 2025Article
- Accuracy between prehospital and hospital diagnosis in helicopter emergency medical services and its consequences for trauma care.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024Article
- Factors influencing on-scene time in a physician-staffed helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS): a retrospective observational study.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2023Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The survival of the severely injured is dependent on the rapid and efficient prehospital treatment. Despite all efforts over the last decades and despite an improved network of rescue helicopters, the time delay between the accident event and admission to the trauma room could not be reduced. A certain proportion of the severely injured need induction of anesthesia even before arrival in hospital (typically as rapid sequence induction, RSI). Due to the medical and technical progress in video laryngoscopy as well as in the means of air rescue used in German-speaking countries, under certain conditions the possibility to carry out induction of anesthesia and airway management in the cabin of the rescue helicopter, i.e. during the transportation, seems to be a possible option to reduce the prehospital time. The aspects dealt with in this article are elementary for a safe execution. A procedure that has been tried and trusted for some time is presented as an example; however, the in-cabin RSI should only be carried out by pretrained teams using a clear standard operating procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.