Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33683351›Full record

ArticleGenetics2021

The impacts of cytoplasmic incompatibility factor (cifA and cifB) genetic variation on phenotypes.

J Dylan Shropshire, Rachel Rosenberg, Seth R Bordenstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Temperature-sensitive cytoplasmic incompatibility across divergentbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Viruses · 2024
    Review
  12. Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  13. Rapid host switching ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Three feminizingFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. PNAS nexus · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

J Dylan ShropshireDepartment of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, VU Station B, Box 35-1634, Nashville, TN 37235, USA.
Rachel RosenbergDepartment of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, VU Station B, Box 35-1634, Nashville, TN 37235, USA.
Seth R BordensteinDepartment of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, VU Station B, Box 35-1634, Nashville, TN 37235, USA.

Funding

The Mechanism of Cytoplasmic IncompatibilityR01AI143725 · NIAID · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI BORDENSTEIN, SETH R · 2020 to 2024
$2.0M
The Genetic Basis of Cytoplasmic IncompatibilityR01AI132581 · NIAID · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI BORDENSTEIN, SETH R · 2017 to 2021
$2.0M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI132581NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI143725
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wolbachia are maternally transmitted, intracellular bacteria that can often selfishly spread through arthropod populations via cytoplasmic incompatibility (CI). CI manifests as embryonic death when males expressing prophage WO genes cifA and cifB mate with uninfected females or females harboring an incompatible Wolbachia strain. Females with a compatible cifA-expressing strain rescue CI. Thus, cif-mediated CI confers a relative fitness advantage to females transmitting Wolbachia. However, whether cif sequence variation underpins incompatibilities between Wolbachia strains and variation in CI penetrance remains unknown. Here, we engineer Drosophila melanogaster to transgenically express cognate and non-cognate cif homologs and assess their CI and rescue capability. Cognate expression revealed that cifA;B native to D. melanogaster causes strong CI, and cognate cifA;B homologs from two other Drosophila-associated Wolbachia cause weak transgenic CI, including the first demonstration of phylogenetic type 2 cifA;B CI. Intriguingly, non-cognate expression of cifA and cifB alleles from different strains revealed that cifA homologs generally contribute to strong transgenic CI and interchangeable rescue despite their evolutionary divergence, and cifB genetic divergence contributes to weak or no transgenic CI. Finally, we find that a type 1 cifA can rescue CI caused by a genetically divergent type 2 cifA;B in a manner consistent with unidirectional incompatibility. By genetically dissecting individual CI functions for type 1 and 2 cifA and cifB, this work illuminates new relationships between cif genotype and CI phenotype. We discuss the relevance of these findings to CI's genetic basis, phenotypic variation patterns, and mechanism.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationPhenotypeAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterFemaleGenetic FitnessInfertilityMaleProphagesSpermatozoaViral ProteinsWolbachiaViral Proteinscytoplasmic incompatibilityDrosophila melanogasterphage WOTwo-by-One modelWolbachia

Identifiers

PMID33683351
PMCPMC8218869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.