ArticleRadiation protection dosimetry2021
VIEWDEX 3.0-RECENT DEVELOPMENT OF A SOFTWARE APPLICATION FACILITATING ASSESSMENT OF IMAGE QUALITY AND OBSERVER PERFORMANCE.
Article in Radiation protection dosimetry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Improving visibility of small anatomical details on low and ultra-low dose computed tomography with artificial intelligence-based image reconstructions.Radiation protection dosimetry · 2026Article
- Assessing the influence of kernel selection on chest computed tomography image quality across varying dose levels using TrueFidelity reconstruction.Radiation protection dosimetry · 2026Article
- Truth-based physics informed estimation of material composition in spectral CT in terms of density and effective atomic number.Physics in medicine and biology · 2026Article
- AI-based denoising improves image quality in HCC volume perfusion CT without affecting Milan classification.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Deep learning-based denoising in cardiac CT: effects on image quality, calcium scoring interchangeability, and reporting workflow.Frontiers in radiology · 2026Article
- Article
- Investigating the effect of adding comparisons with prior mammograms to standalone digital breast tomosynthesis screening.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2025Article
- Comparing synthetic mammograms based on wide-angle digital breast tomosynthesis with digital mammograms.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2025Article
- Breathing motion compensation in chest tomosynthesis: evaluation of the effect on image quality and presence of artifacts.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2025Article
- Lung nodule localization and size estimation on chest tomosynthesis.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2025Article
- Optimization of photon counting CT for cardiac imaging in patients with left ventricular assist devices: An in-depth assessment of metal artifacts.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024Article
- Image quality of spectral brain computed tomography angiography using halved dose of iodine contrast medium.Neuroradiology · 2023Article
- Evaluation of deep-learning image reconstruction for chest CT examinations at two different dose levels.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
ViewDEX (Viewer for Digital Evaluation of X-ray Images) is an image viewer compatible with Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) that has been especially designed to facilitate image perception and observer performance studies within medical imaging. The software was first released in 2004 and since then a continuous development has been ongoing. One of the major drawbacks of previous versions of ViewDEX has been that they have lacked functionality enabling the possibility to evaluate multiple images and/or image stacks simultaneously. This functionality is especially requested by researchers working with modalities, where an image acquisition can result in multiple image stacks (e.g. axial, coronal and sagittal reformations in computed tomography). In ViewDEX 3.0 this functionality has been added and it is now possible to perform image evaluations of multiple images and/or image stacks simultaneously, by using multiple monitors and/or multiple image canvases in monitors. Additionally, some of the previously available functionality has been updated and improved. This paper describes the recent developments of ViewDEX 3.0.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.