Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33683317›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2021

Limited Evidence for Sensory Prediction Error Responses in Visual Cortex of Macaques and Humans.

Selina S Solomon, Huizhen Tang, Elyse Sussman, Adam Kohn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Hierarchical substrates of prediction in visual cortical spiking.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Feature-specific predictive processing: What's in a prediction error?Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Recent Visual Experience Reshapes V4 Neuronal Activity and Improves Perceptual Performance.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Stimulus-Specific Prediction Error Neurons in Mouse Auditory Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Selina S SolomonDominick P. Purpura Department of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461, USA.
Huizhen TangDominick P. Purpura Department of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461, USA.
Elyse SussmanDominick P. Purpura Department of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461, USA.
Adam KohnDominick P. Purpura Department of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461, USA.

Funding

SUPPORT FOR THE ROSE F KENNEDY IDDRC P50P50HD105352 · NICHD · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI Julie Secombe · 2021 to 2026
$7.0M
Visual CrowdingR01EY028626 · NEI · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, INC · PI KOHN, ADAM · 2018 to 2022
$2.4M
Learning and updating internal visual modelsR01EY024858 · NEI · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, INC · PI KOHN, ADAM, SCHWARTZ, ODELIA · 2015 to 2017
$1.7M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY024858NEI NIH HHS R01 EY028626NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD105352
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A recent formulation of predictive coding theory proposes that a subset of neurons in each cortical area encodes sensory prediction errors, the difference between predictions relayed from higher cortex and the sensory input. Here, we test for evidence of prediction error responses in spiking responses and local field potentials (LFP) recorded in primary visual cortex and area V4 of macaque monkeys, and in complementary electroencephalographic (EEG) scalp recordings in human participants. We presented a fixed sequence of visual stimuli on most trials, and violated the expected ordering on a small subset of trials. Under predictive coding theory, pattern-violating stimuli should trigger robust prediction errors, but we found that spiking, LFP and EEG responses to expected and pattern-violating stimuli were nearly identical. Our results challenge the assertion that a fundamental computational motif in sensory cortex is to signal prediction errors, at least those based on predictions derived from temporal patterns of visual stimulation.

Indexed as

AdultAnimalsElectrodes, ImplantedElectroencephalographyEvoked Potentials, VisualFemaleForecastingHumansMacacaMalePhotic StimulationPrimary Visual CortexVisual CortexYoung Adultadaptationarea V4local field potentialomissionpredictive codingprimary visual cortexrepetition suppressionVEP

Identifiers

PMID33683317
PMCPMC8599921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.