Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33682779›Full record

ArticleTechnology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine2021

Predicting hypertensive disorders in pregnancy using multiple methods: Models with the placental growth factor parameter.

Ge Sun, Qi Xu, Song Zhang, Lin Yang, Guoli Liu, Yu Meng, Aiqing Chen, Yimin Yang, Xuwen Li, Dongmei Hao and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ge SunFaculty of Environment and Life Sciences, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China.
Qi XuPeking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China.
Song ZhangFaculty of Environment and Life Sciences, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China.
Lin YangFaculty of Environment and Life Sciences, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China.
Guoli LiuPeking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China.
Yu MengFaculty of Environment and Life Sciences, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China.
Aiqing ChenBeijing Yes Medical Devices Co. Ltd., Beijing 100152, China.
Yimin YangFaculty of Environment and Life Sciences, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China.
Xuwen LiFaculty of Environment and Life Sciences, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China.
Dongmei HaoFaculty of Environment and Life Sciences, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China.
Xiaohong LiuBeijing Yes Medical Devices Co. Ltd., Beijing 100152, China.
Jing ShaoBeijing Yes Medical Devices Co. Ltd., Beijing 100152, China.
Beijing University of Technology · CNPeking University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPlacental growth factor (PlGF), one of the biomarkers, has a certain predictive effect on hypertensive disorders in pregnancy (HDP).

objectiveTo study the HDP prediction effect of different methods for variable selection and modeling for models containing PlGF.

methodsFor the model containing PlGF, the appropriate range of PlGF parameters needed to be selected. Step-logistic regression and lasso were used to compare the model effect of twice range selection. The PlGF model with good predictive effect and appropriate detecting gestational age was selected for the final prediction.

resultsThe effect of the model containing PlGF tested at 15-16 weeks was better than the PlGF value without comprehensive screening. The sensitivity of both methods was over 92%. By comprehensive comparison, the final model of lasso method in this study was more effective.

conclusionsIn this study, a variety of methods were used to screen models containing PlGF parameters. According to clinical needs and model effects, the optimal HDP prediction model with PlGF parameters in the second trimester of 15-26 weeks of pregnancy was finally selected.

Indexed as

Hypertension, Pregnancy-InducedBiomarkersFemaleGestational AgeHumansPlacenta Growth FactorPregnancyBiomarkersPlacenta Growth Factormodel parametersPlacental growth factorvariable selection

Identifiers

PMID33682779
PMCPMC8150465
OpenAlexW3135429282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.