Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33682765›Full record

ArticleTechnology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine2021

Cancer classification and biomarker selection via a penalized logsum network-based logistic regression model.

Zhiming Zhou, Haihui Huang, Yong Liang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Integrating molecular interactions and gene expression to identify biomarkers and network modules of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zhiming ZhouFaculty of Information Technology, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau, China.
Haihui HuangFaculty of Information Technology, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau, China.
Yong LiangMacau Institute of Systems Engineering and Collaborative Laboratory of Intelligent Science and Systems, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn genome research, it is particularly important to identify molecular biomarkers or signaling pathways related to phenotypes. Logistic regression model is a powerful discrimination method that can offer a clear statistical explanation and obtain the classification probability of classification label information. However, it is unable to fulfill biomarker selection.

objectiveThe aim of this paper is to give the model efficient gene selection capability.

methodsIn this paper, we propose a new penalized logsum network-based regularization logistic regression model for gene selection and cancer classification.

resultsExperimental results on simulated data sets show that our method is effective in the analysis of high-dimensional data. For a large data set, the proposed method has achieved 89.66% (training) and 90.02% (testing) AUC performances, which are, on average, 5.17% (training) and 4.49% (testing) better than mainstream methods.

conclusionsThe proposed method can be considered a promising tool for gene selection and cancer classification of high-dimensional biological data.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsBiomarkersHumansLogistic ModelsBiomarkersgene selectionlog-sum penaltynetwork-based knowledgeRegularization

Identifiers

PMID33682765
PMCPMC8150479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.