Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33682719›Full record

Observational studyJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD2021

Cerebrospinal Fluid Proteome Changes in Older Non-Cardiac Surgical Patients with Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction.

Keith W VanDusen, Yi-Ju Li, Victor Cai, Ashley Hall, Sarah Hiles, J Will Thompson, M Arthur Moseley, Mary Cooter, Leah Acker, Jerrold H Levy and 10 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Successful aging after elective surgery II: Study design and methods.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2023
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Keith W VanDusenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Yi-Ju LiDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Victor CaiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Ashley HallDepartment of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Sarah HilesDuke Center for Genomic and Computational Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
J Will ThompsonDuke Center for Genomic and Computational Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
M Arthur MoseleyDuke Center for Genomic and Computational Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Mary CooterDepartment of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Leah AckerDepartment of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Jerrold H LevyDepartment of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Kamrouz GhadimiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Quintin J QuiñonesDepartment of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Michael J DevinneyDepartment of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Stacey ChungDepartment of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Niccolò TerrandoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Eugene W MorettiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Jeffrey N BrowndykeDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Division of Geriatric Behavioral Health, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Joseph P MathewDepartment of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Miles BergerDepartment of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
MADCO-PC Investigators
Duke Medical Center · USDuke University Hospital · USDuke University · US

Funding

Resource Core 3 - Metabolomics CoreP30AG028716 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Sarah B. Peskoe · 2006 to 2026
$24.6M
INTEGRATED TRAINING IN ANESTHESIOLOGY RESEARCHT32GM008600 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Miriam Treggiari · 1996 to 2026
$6.6M
Physical Resiliencies: Indicators and Mechanisms in the Elderly CollaborativeUH3AG056925 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI COLON-EMERIC, CATHLEEN S · 2019 to 2021
$4.6M
Neuro-inflammation in Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction: CSF and fMRI StudiesK76AG057022 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BERGER, MILES · 2017 to 2022
$1.4M
The Significance of Perioperative Changes in CSF tau levels in the ElderlyR03AG050918 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BERGER, MILES · 2015 to 2016
$219k
NIA NIH HHS K76 AG057022NIA NIH HHS P30 AG028716NIA NIH HHS R03 AG050918NIA NIH HHS UH3 AG056925NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008600
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPostoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD), a syndrome of cognitive deficits occurring 1-12 months after surgery primarily in older patients, is associated with poor postoperative outcomes. POCD is hypothesized to result from neuroinflammation; however, the pathways involved remain unclear. Unbiased proteomic analyses have been used to identify neuroinflammatory pathways in multiple neurologic diseases and syndromes but have not yet been applied to POCD.

objectiveTo utilize unbiased mass spectrometry-based proteomics to identify potential neuroinflammatory pathways underlying POCD.

methodsUnbiased LC-MS/MS proteomics was performed on immunodepleted cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples obtained before, 24 hours after, and 6 weeks after major non-cardiac surgery in older adults who did (n = 8) or did not develop POCD (n = 6). Linear mixed models were used to select peptides and proteins with intensity differences for pathway analysis.

resultsMass spectrometry quantified 8,258 peptides from 1,222 proteins in > 50%of patient samples at all three time points. Twelve peptides from 11 proteins showed differences in expression over time between patients with versus withoutPOCD (q < 0.05), including proteins previously implicated in neurodegenerative disease pathophysiology. Additionally, 283 peptides from 182 proteins were identified with trend-level differences (q < 0.25) in expression over time between these groups. Among these, pathway analysis revealed that 50 were from 17 proteins mapping to complement and coagulation pathways (q = 2.44*10-13).

conclusionThese data demonstrate the feasibility of performing unbiased mass spectrometry on perioperative CSF samples to identify pathways associated with POCD. Additionally, they provide hypothesis-generating evidence for CSF complement and coagulation pathway changes in patients with POCD.

Indexed as

AgedBiomarkersCase-Control StudiesCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMalePostoperative Cognitive ComplicationsProteomeTandem Mass SpectrometryBiomarkersProteomeInflammationmass spectrometryneurocognitive disorderspostoperative cognitive dysfunctionproteomics

Identifiers

PMID33682719
PMCPMC8052629
OpenAlexW3113152691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.