Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33682641›Full record

ArticleEmerging microbes & infections2021

The epidemiological characteristics of enterovirus infection before and after the use of enterovirus 71 inactivated vaccine in Kunming, China.

Hongchao Jiang, Zhen Zhang, Qing Rao, Xiaodan Wang, Meifen Wang, Tingyi Du, Jiaolian Tang, Shuying Long, Juan Zhang, Jia Luo and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Emerging microbes & infections, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Analysis of miRNAs involved in mouse brain injury upon Coxsackievirus A6 infection.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Hongchao JiangInstitute of Medical Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Kunming, People's Republic of China.
Zhen ZhangKunming Children's Hospital, The Affiliated Children's Hospital of Kunming Medical University; Institute of Pediatric Disease Research in Yunnan, Kunming, People's Republic of China.
Qing RaoKunming Children's Hospital, The Affiliated Children's Hospital of Kunming Medical University; Institute of Pediatric Disease Research in Yunnan, Kunming, People's Republic of China.
Xiaodan WangInstitute of Medical Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Kunming, People's Republic of China.
Meifen WangKunming Children's Hospital, The Affiliated Children's Hospital of Kunming Medical University; Institute of Pediatric Disease Research in Yunnan, Kunming, People's Republic of China.
Tingyi DuKunming Children's Hospital, The Affiliated Children's Hospital of Kunming Medical University; Institute of Pediatric Disease Research in Yunnan, Kunming, People's Republic of China.
Jiaolian TangKunming Children's Hospital, The Affiliated Children's Hospital of Kunming Medical University; Institute of Pediatric Disease Research in Yunnan, Kunming, People's Republic of China.
Shuying LongKunming Children's Hospital, The Affiliated Children's Hospital of Kunming Medical University; Institute of Pediatric Disease Research in Yunnan, Kunming, People's Republic of China.
Juan ZhangInstitute of Medical Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Kunming, People's Republic of China.
Jia LuoInstitute of Medical Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Kunming, People's Republic of China.
Yue PanInstitute of Medical Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Kunming, People's Republic of China.
Junying ChenInstitute of Medical Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Kunming, People's Republic of China.
Jing MaKunming Children's Hospital, The Affiliated Children's Hospital of Kunming Medical University; Institute of Pediatric Disease Research in Yunnan, Kunming, People's Republic of China.
Xiaomei LiuKunming Children's Hospital, The Affiliated Children's Hospital of Kunming Medical University; Institute of Pediatric Disease Research in Yunnan, Kunming, People's Republic of China.
Mao FanKunming Children's Hospital, The Affiliated Children's Hospital of Kunming Medical University; Institute of Pediatric Disease Research in Yunnan, Kunming, People's Republic of China.
Tiesong ZhangKunming Children's Hospital, The Affiliated Children's Hospital of Kunming Medical University; Institute of Pediatric Disease Research in Yunnan, Kunming, People's Republic of China.
Qiangming SunInstitute of Medical Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Kunming, People's Republic of China.
Kunming Medical University · CNInstitut de Recherche Vaccinale · FRChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNKunming Children's Hospital · CNYunnan University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University · CNInstitute of Medical Biology · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enterovirus A71 (EV-A71) inactivated vaccines have been widely inoculated among children in Kunming City after it was approved. However, there was a large-scale outbreak of Enteroviruses (EVs) infection in Kunming, 2018. The epidemiological characteristics of HFMD and EVs were analysed during 2008-2018, which are before and three years after EV-A71 vaccine starting to use. The changes in infection spectrum were also investigated, especially for severe HFMD in 2018. The incidence of EV-A71 decreased dramatically after the EV-A71 vaccine starting use. The proportion of non-CV-A16/EV-A71 EVs positive patients raised to 77.17-85.82%, while, EV-A71 and CV-A16 only accounted for 3.41-7.24% and 6.94-19.42% in 2017 and 2018, respectively. CV-A6 was the most important causative agent in all clinical symptoms (severe HFMD, HFMD, Herpangina and fever), accounting from 42.13% to 62.33%. EV-A71 only account for 0.36-2.05%. In severe HFMD, CV-A6 (62.33%), CV-A10 (11.64%), and CV-A16 (10.96%) were the major causative agent in 2018. EV-A71 inactivated vaccine has a good protective effect against EV-A71 and induced EVs infection spectrum changefully. EV-A71 vaccine has no or insignificant cross-protection effect on CV-A6, CV-A10, and CV-A16. Herein, developing 4-valent combined vaccines is urgently needed.

Indexed as

AdolescentChildChild, PreschoolChinaDisease OutbreaksEnterovirus A, HumanEnterovirus InfectionsFecesFemaleHand, Foot and Mouth DiseaseHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInpatientsMaleReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, ViralVaccines, Inactivatedenterovirus A71 vaccineepidemiological characteristicsHand-foot-and-mouth diseasepathogen spectrumsurveillance

Identifiers

PMID33682641
PMCPMC8018479
OpenAlexW3134870239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.