Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33682576›Full record

ArticleExpert review of pharmacoeconomics & outcomes research2021

A visual approach to the economic evaluation of vaccines: opening the health economic black box.

Enoch Kung, Maria Vittoria Bufali, Alec Morton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Expert review of pharmacoeconomics & outcomes research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Enoch KungClinical Operational Research Unit, Department of Mathematics, University College London, London, UK.
Maria Vittoria BufaliDepartment of Management Science, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.
Alec MortonDepartment of Management Science, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3803-8517

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe economic evaluation of vaccines has attracted a great deal of controversy. In the academic literature, several vaccination advocates argue that the evaluation frame for vaccines should be expanded to give a more complete picture of their benefits. We seek to contribute to the debate and facilitate informed dialogue about vaccine assessment using visualization, as able to support both deliberation by technical committees about the substance of evaluation and communication of the underlying rationale to non-experts.

methodsWe present two visualizations, an Individual Risk Plot (IRP), and a Population Impact Plot (PIP), both showing the beneficiary population on one axis and the degree of individual benefit and cost of an individual dose on the second axis. We sketch out such graphs for 10 vaccines belonging to the UK routine childhood immunization schedule and present our own analysis for the rotavirus and meningitis B vaccines.

resultsWhile the IRPs help classify diseases by morbidity and mortality, the PIPs display the health and economic loss averted after introducing a vaccine, allowing further comparisons.

conclusionThe visualizations presented, albeit open to provide an increasingly complete accounting of the value of vaccination, ensure consistency of approach where comparative judgments are most needed.

Indexed as

Models, EconomicChildCost-Benefit AnalysisEconomics, MedicalHumansImmunization ProgramsImmunization ScheduleUnited KingdomVaccinationVaccinesVaccinescost-effectivenessEconomic evaluationmeningitisrotavirusvaccinationvaccinevisualization

Identifiers

PMID33682576
PMCPMC8475717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.