Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33682435›Full record

SynthesisJournal of the American Heart Association2021

Efficacy and Safety of Long-Term Antithrombotic Strategies in Patients With Chronic Coronary Syndrome: A Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Houyong Zhu, Xiaoqun Xu, Xiaojiang Fang, Fei Ying, Liuguang Song, Beibei Gao, Guoxin Tong, Liang Zhou, Tielong Chen, Jinyu Huang

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Houyong ZhuDepartment of Cardiology Hangzhou TCM Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang Chinese Medical University Hangzhou Zhejiang China.
Xiaoqun XuAffiliated Hangzhou Chest Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine Zhejiang China.
Xiaojiang FangDepartment of Cardiology Hangzhou TCM Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang Chinese Medical University Hangzhou Zhejiang China.
Fei YingDepartment of Cardiology Hangzhou TCM Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang Chinese Medical University Hangzhou Zhejiang China.
Liuguang SongDepartment of Cardiology Hangzhou TCM Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang Chinese Medical University Hangzhou Zhejiang China.
Beibei GaoThe Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine Hangzhou Zhejiang China.
Guoxin TongThe Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine Hangzhou Zhejiang China.
Liang ZhouThe Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine Hangzhou Zhejiang China.
Tielong ChenDepartment of Cardiology Hangzhou TCM Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang Chinese Medical University Hangzhou Zhejiang China.
Jinyu HuangThe Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine Hangzhou Zhejiang China.
Zhejiang Chinese Medical University · CNHangzhou First People's Hospital · CNZhejiang Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Long-term antithrombotic strategies for patients with chronic coronary syndrome with high-risk factors represent an important treatment dilemma in clinical practice. Our aim was to conduct a network meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of long-term antithrombotic strategies in patients with chronic coronary syndrome. Methods and Results Four randomized studies were included (n=75167; THEMIS [Ticagrelor on Health Outcomes in Diabetes Mellitus Patients Intervention Study], COMPASS [Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies], PEGASUS-TIMI 54 [Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Prior Heart Attack Using Ticagrelor Compared to Placebo on a Background of Aspirin-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 54], and DAPT [Dual Anti-platelet Therapy]). The odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs) were calculated as the measure of effect size. The results of the network meta-analysis showed that, compared with aspirin monotherapy, the ORs for trial-defined major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events were 0.86; (95% CI, 0.80-0.93) for ticagrelor plus aspirin, 0.89 (95% CI, 0.78-1.02) for rivaroxaban monotherapy, 0.74 (95% CI, 0.64-0.85) for rivaroxaban plus aspirin, and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.60,-0.86) for thienopyridine plus aspirin. Compared with aspirin monotherapy, the ORs for trial-defined major bleeding were 2.15 (95% CI, 1.78-2.59]) for ticagrelor plus aspirin, 1.51 (95% CI, 1.23-1.85) for rivaroxaban monotherapy, and 1.68 (95% CI, 1.37-2.05) for rivaroxaban plus aspirin. For death from any cause, the improvement effect of rivaroxaban plus aspirin was detected versus aspirin monotherapy (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.65-0.90), ticagrelor plus aspirin (OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.66-0.95), rivaroxaban monotherapy (OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.69-0.97), and thienopyridine plus aspirin (OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.41-0.82) regimens. Conclusions All antithrombotic strategies combined with aspirin significantly reduced the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events and increased the risk of major bleeding compared with aspirin monotherapy. Considering the outcomes of all ischemic and bleeding events and all-cause mortality, rivaroxaban plus aspirin appears to be the preferred long-term antithrombotic regimen for patients with chronic coronary syndrome and high-risk factors.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicChronic DiseaseCoronary Artery DiseaseFibrinolytic AgentsFollow-Up StudiesHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicThrombolytic TherapyTime FactorsFibrinolytic Agentschronic coronary syndromelong‐term antithrombotic strategiesprevious percutaneous coronary intervention

Identifiers

PMID33682435
PMCPMC8174196
OpenAlexW3135188003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.