ArticleColorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland2021
Short-term outcomes of a COVID-adapted triage pathway for colorectal cancer detection.
Article in Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06165328 (The Comparison of Diagnostic Yield Between Routine Computed Tomography and Colonoscope in Detecting Colorectal Tumors in Patients Who at Risk of Colorectal Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Comparison of Diagnostic Yield Between Routine Computed Tomography and Colonoscope in Detecting Colorectal Tumors in Patients Who at Risk of Colorectal Cancer
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Colorectal Cancer Screening: a Systematic Review.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2022Pooled it
- The impact of COVID-19 on colorectal cancer in regional Northern Australia and changes to treatment related to distance to care: a retrospective cohort study.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024Article
- Prevalence of repeat faecal immunochemical testing in symptomatic patients attending primary care.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2022Observational
- Colorectal cancer care in the COVID-19 era: outcomes from a 'mixed site' model.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2022Article
- Global Impact of COVID-19 on Colorectal Cancer Screening: Current Insights and Future Directions.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Review
- A Review of the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Colorectal Cancer Screening: Implications and Solutions.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Palliative Care in Cancer Patients in Spain.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Risk of missing colorectal cancer with a COVID-adapted diagnostic pathway using quantitative faecal immunochemical testing.BJS open · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
aimThe dramatic curtailment of endoscopy and CT colonography capacity during the coronavirus pandemic has adversely impacted timely diagnosis of colorectal cancer (CRC). We describe a rapidly implemented COVID-adapted diagnostic pathway to mitigate risk and maximize cancer diagnosis in patients referred with symptoms of suspected CRC.
methodThe 'COVID-adapted pathway' integrated multiple quantitative faecal immunochemical tests (qFIT) to enrich for significant colorectal disease with judicious use of CT with oral contrast to detect gross pathology. Patients reporting 'high-risk' symptoms were triaged to qFIT+CT and the remainder underwent an initial qFIT to inform subsequent investigation. Demographic and clinical data were prospectively collected. Outcomes comprised cancer detection frequency.
resultsOverall, 422 patients (median age 64 years, 220 women) were triaged using this pathway. Most (84.6%) were referred as 'urgent suspicious of cancer'. Of the 422 patients, 202 (47.9%) were triaged to CT and qFIT, 211 (50.0%) to qFIT only, eight (1.9%) to outpatient clinic and one to colonoscopy. Fifteen (3.6%) declined investigation and seven (1.7%) were deemed unfit. We detected 13 cancers (3.1%), similar to the mean cancer detection rate from all referrals in 2017-2019 (3.3%). Compared with the period 1 April-31 May in 2017-2019, we observed a 43% reduction in all primary care referrals (1071 referrals expected reducing to 609).
conclusionThis COVID-adapted pathway mitigated the adverse effects on diagnostic capacity and detected cancer at the expected rate within those referred. However, the overall reduction in the number of referrals was substantial. The described risk-mitigating measures could be a useful adjunct whilst standard diagnostic services remain constrained due to the ongoing pandemic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.