ReviewCatheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions2021
Mechanical circulatory support in acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock: Challenges and importance of randomized control trials.
Review in Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cardiogenic Shock Detection Using Electronic Medical Records: A Review and Blueprint for Clinical Implementation and Future Research.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Review
- Racial and ethnic disparities in utilization of mechanical circulatory support for cardiogenic shock following acute myocardial infarction: a retrospective cross-sectional study.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Combined mechanical ventilatory and mechanical circulatory support aids pulmonary vascular state in cardiogenic shock.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2025Article
- Managing the acute cardiac functional crisis: a comprehensive review of cardiogenic shock management strategies.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025Article
- Cardiogenic Shock in Older Adults: A Focus on Age-Associated Risks and Approach to Management: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation · 2024Review
- Prolonged Impella 5.0/5.5 support within different pathways of care for cardiogenic shock: the experience of a referral center.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Contemporary approach to cardiogenic shock care: a state-of-the-art review.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- Early Utilization of Mechanical Circulatory Support in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: The National Cardiogenic Shock Initiative.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023Article
- One-Year Survival for Developing Acute Kidney Injury in Adult Patients with AMI Cardiogenic Shock Receiving Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.International journal of general medicine · 2023Article
- Real-World Data on the Intravascular Microaxial Left Ventricular Flow Pump (Impella) in High-Risk Patients.Korean circulation journal · 2021Review
- Current Landscape of Temporary Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Technology.US cardiology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAcute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality.
methodsWe provide an overview of previously conducted studies on the use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices in the treatment of AMI-CS and difficulties which may be encountered in conducting such trials in the United States.
resultsWell powered randomized control trials are difficult to conduct in a critically ill patient population due to physician preferences, perceived lack of equipoise and challenges obtaining informed consent.
conclusionsWith growth in utilization of MCS devices in patients with AMI-CS, efforts to perform well-powered, randomized control trials must be undertaken.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.