Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33682040›Full record

SynthesisNeurosurgical review2021

Intravenous milrinone for treatment of delayed cerebral ischaemia following subarachnoid haemorrhage: a pooled systematic review.

Mendel Castle-Kirszbaum, Leon Lai, Julian Maingard, Hamed Asadi, R Andrew Danks, Tony Goldschlager, Ronil V Chandra

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Pharmacotherapy in SAH: Clinical Trial Lessons.CNS & neurological disorders drug targets · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mendel Castle-KirszbaumDepartment of Neurosurgery, Monash Health, 246 Clayton Road, Clayton, Melbourne, VIC, 3168, Australia. mdck.journal@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1769-2712
Leon LaiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Monash Health, 246 Clayton Road, Clayton, Melbourne, VIC, 3168, Australia.
Julian MaingardDepartment of Neurointerventional Radiology, Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Hamed AsadiDepartment of Neurointerventional Radiology, Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia.
R Andrew DanksDepartment of Neurosurgery, Monash Health, 246 Clayton Road, Clayton, Melbourne, VIC, 3168, Australia.
Tony GoldschlagerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Monash Health, 246 Clayton Road, Clayton, Melbourne, VIC, 3168, Australia.
Ronil V ChandraDepartment of Surgery, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Monash Health · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Small trials have demonstrated promising results utilising intravenous milrinone for the treatment of delayed cerebral ischaemia (DCI) after subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH). Here we summarise and contextualise the literature and discuss the future directions of intravenous milrinone for DCI. A systematic, pooled analysis of literature was performed in accordance with the PRISMA statement. Methodological rigour was analysed using the MINORS criteria. Extracted data included patient population; treatment protocol; and clinical, radiological, and functional outcome. The primary outcome was clinical resolution of DCI. Eight hundred eighteen patients from 10 single-centre, observational studies were identified. Half (n = 5) of the studies were prospective and all were at high risk of bias. Mean age was 52 years, and females (69%) outnumbered males. There was a similar proportion of low-grade (WFNS 1-2) (49.7%) and high-grade (WFNS 3-5) (50.3%) SAH. Intravenous milrinone was administered to 523/818 (63.9%) participants. Clinical resolution of DCI was achieved in 375/424 (88%), with similar rates demonstrated with intravenous (291/330, 88%) and combined intra-arterial-intravenous (84/94, 89%) therapy. Angiographic response was seen in 165/234 (71%) receiving intravenous milrinone. Hypotension (70/303, 23%) and hypokalaemia (31/287, 11%) were common drug effects. Four cases (0.5%) of drug intolerance occurred. Good functional outcome was achieved in 271/364 (74%) patients. Cerebral infarction attributable to DCI occurred in 47/250 (19%), with lower rates in asymptomatic spasm. Intravenous milrinone is a safe and feasible therapy for DCI. A signal for efficacy is demonstrated in small, low-quality trials. Future research should endeavour to establish the optimal protocol and dose, prior to a phase-3 study.

Indexed as

Brain IschemiaPharmaceutical PreparationsSubarachnoid HemorrhageVasospasm, IntracranialCerebral InfarctionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMilrinoneProspective StudiesMilrinonePharmaceutical PreparationsDelayed cerebral ischaemiaMilrinoneSubarachnoid haemorrhageVasospasm

Identifiers

PMID33682040
OpenAlexW3135713048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.