Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33681997›Full record

ArticleSocial cognitive and affective neuroscience2023

Correlates of neural adaptation to food cues and taste: the role of obesity risk factors.

Jennifer R Sadler, Grace E Shearrer, Afroditi Papantoni, Sonja T Yokum, Eric Stice, Kyle S Burger

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. The social neuroscience of eating: an introduction to the special issue.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer R SadlerDepartment of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27516, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6641-2196
Grace E ShearrerDepartment of Family and Consumer Sciences, College of Agriculture, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071, USA.
Afroditi PapantoniDepartment of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27516, USA.
Sonja T YokumOregon Research Institute, Eugene, OR 97403, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4691-6968
Eric SticeDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA 94304, USA.
Kyle S BurgerDepartment of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27516, USA.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USOregon Research Institute · USStanford Medicine · USUniversity of Wyoming · US

Funding

Relation of Consummatory and Anticipatory Food Reward to ObesityR01DK080760 · NIDDK · OREGON RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI STICE, ERIC M, YOKUM, SONJA · 2009 to 2013
$3.3M
Neurobehavioral Plasticity to Regular Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Intake; An fMRI ExperimentR01DK112317 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BURGER, KYLE S. · 2017 to 2021
$2.8M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK080760NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK112317
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying correlates of brain response to food cues and taste provides critical information on individual differences that may influence variability in eating behavior. However, a few studies examine how brain response changes over repeated exposures and the individual factors that are associated with these changes. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, we examined how brain response to a palatable taste and proceeding cues changed over repeated exposures and how individual differences in weight, familial obesity risk, dietary restraint and reward responsiveness correlate with these changes. In healthy-weight adolescents (n = 154), caudate and posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) response increased with repeated cue presentations, and oral somatosensory cortex and insula response increased with repeated milkshake tastes. The magnitude of increase over exposures in the left PCC to cues was positively associated with body mass index percentile (r = 0.18, P = 0.026) and negatively associated with dietary restraint scores (r = -0.24, P = 0.003). Adolescents with familial obesity risk showed higher cue-evoked caudate response across time, compared to the low-risk group (r = 0.12, P = 0.035). Reward responsiveness positively correlated with right oral somatosensory cortex/insula response to milkshake over time (r = 0.19, P = 0.018). The results show that neural responses to food cues and taste change over time and that individual differences related to weight gain are correlated with these changes.

Indexed as

CuesObesityTasteAdolescentBody Mass IndexBrain MappingFoodHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingRewardRisk FactorsadolescentfMRIincentive sensitizationobesitytaste

Identifiers

PMID33681997
PMCPMC10074771
OpenAlexW3134573070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.