Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33681864›Full record

ArticleAdvanced nanobiomed research2021

Considerations for Size, Surface Charge, Polymer Degradation, Co-Delivery, and Manufacturability in the Development of Polymeric Particle Vaccines for Infectious Diseases.

Christopher J Genito, Cole J Batty, Eric M Bachelder, Kristy M Ainslie

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced nanobiomed research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Optimizing delivery in a multivalent subunit influenza vaccine using mixed polymeric microparticle degradation rates.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A comprehensive comparison of DNA and RNA vaccines.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Antibody therapeutics · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Micro and nanotechnologies: The little formulations that could.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christopher J GenitoDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 4211 Marsico Hall, 125 Mason Farm Road Chapel Hill NC 27599 USA.
Cole J BattyDivision of Pharma Engineering & Molecular Pharmaceutics Eshelman School of Pharmacy University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 4211 Marsico Hall, 125 Mason Farm Road Chapel Hill NC 27599 USA.
Eric M BachelderDivision of Pharma Engineering & Molecular Pharmaceutics Eshelman School of Pharmacy University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 4211 Marsico Hall, 125 Mason Farm Road Chapel Hill NC 27599 USA.
Kristy M AinslieDivision of Pharma Engineering & Molecular Pharmaceutics Eshelman School of Pharmacy University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 4211 Marsico Hall, 125 Mason Farm Road Chapel Hill NC 27599 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1820-8382
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

BASIC IMMUNE MECHANISMST32AI007273 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI TISCH, ROLAND M · 1985 to 2020
$5.6M
Optimizing a Universal Influenza Subunit Nano/Microparticulate VaccineR01AI147497 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI AINSLIE, KRISTY M · 2020 to 2024
$2.9M
Biomaterials to study tolerance immune induction kineticsR01AI137525 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI AINSLIE, KRISTY M · 2018 to 2022
$1.9M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI137525NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI147497NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007273
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccines have advanced human health for centuries. To improve upon the efficacy of subunit vaccines they have been formulated into nano/microparticles for infectious diseases. Much progress in the field of polymeric particles for vaccine formulation has been made since the push for a tetanus vaccine in the 1990s. Modulation of particle properties such as size, surface charge, degradation rate, and the co-delivery of antigen and adjuvant has been used. This review focuses on advances in the understanding of how these properties influence immune responses to injectable polymeric particle vaccines. Consideration is also given to how endotoxin, route of administration, and other factors influence conclusions that can be made. Current manufacturing techniques involved in preserving vaccine efficacy and scale-up are discussed, as well as those for progressing polymeric particle vaccines toward commercialization. Consideration of all these factors should aid the continued development of efficacious and marketable polymeric particle vaccines.

Indexed as

controlled releasemanufacturingnanoparticlespolymeric particlesvaccines

Identifiers

PMID33681864
PMCPMC7917382
OpenAlexW3110774889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.