Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33681744›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2021

Intramuscular midazolam, olanzapine, or haloperidol for the management of acute agitation: A multi-centre, double-blind, randomised clinical trial.

Esther W Chan, Kim S J Lao, Lam Lam, Sik-Hon Tsui, Chun-Tat Lui, Chi-Pang Wong, Colin A Graham, Chi-Hung Cheng, Tong-Shun Chung, Hiu-Fung Lam and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 11 institutions in 4 countries.

Esther W ChanCentre for Safe Medication Practice and Research, Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR.
Kim S J LaoCentre for Safe Medication Practice and Research, Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR.
Lam LamCentre for Safe Medication Practice and Research, Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR.
Sik-Hon TsuiAccident and Emergency Department, Queen Mary Hospital, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong SAR.
Chun-Tat LuiAccident and Emergency Department, Tuen Mun Hospital, Tuen Mun, Hong Kong SAR.
Chi-Pang WongAccident and Emergency Department, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Chai Wan, Hong Kong SAR.
Colin A GrahamAccident and Emergency Medicine Academic Unit, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR.
Chi-Hung ChengAccident and Emergency Medicine Academic Unit, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR.
Tong-Shun ChungAccident and Emergency Department, Ruttonjee Hospital, Wan Chai, Hong Kong SAR.
Hiu-Fung LamAccident and Emergency Department, United Christian Hospital, Kwun Tong, Hong Kong SAR.
Soo-Moi TingAccident and Emergency Department, United Christian Hospital, Kwun Tong, Hong Kong SAR.
Jonathan C KnottDepartment of Critical Care, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
David M TaylorEmergency Department, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.
David C M KongPharmacy Department, Ballarat Health Services, Ballarat, Victoria, Australia.
Ling-Pong LeungEmergency Medicine Unit, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong SAR.
Ian C K WongCentre for Safe Medication Practice and Research, Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR.
University of Hong Kong · HKChinese University of Hong Kong · HKThe University of Melbourne · AUUnited Christian Hospital · CNBallarat Health Services · AUCity University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen Research Institute · CNPamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital · CNQueen Mary Hospital · CNRuttonjee Hospital · CNTuen Mun Hospital · CNUniversity of Hong Kong - Shenzhen Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe safety and effectiveness of intramuscular olanzapine or haloperidol compared to midazolam as the initial pharmacological treatment for acute agitation in emergency departments (EDs) has not been evaluated.

methodsA pragmatic, randomised, double-blind, active-controlled trial was conducted from December 2014 to September 2019, in six Hong Kong EDs. Patients (aged 18-75 years) with undifferentiated acute agitation requiring parenteral sedation were randomised to 5 mg intramuscular midazolam (

findingsOf 206 patients randomised, 167 (mean age, 42 years; 98 [58·7%] male) were analysed. Median time to sedation for IM midazolam, olanzapine, and haloperidol was 8·5 (IQR 8·0), 11·5 (IQR 30·0), and 23·0 (IQR 21·0) min, respectively. At 60 min, similar proportions of patients were adequately sedated (98%, 87%, and 97%). There were statistically significant differences for time to sedation with midazolam compared to olanzapine (

interpretationMidazolam resulted in faster sedation in patients with undifferentiated agitation in the emergency setting compared to olanzapine and haloperidol. Midazolam and olanzapine are preferred over haloperidol's slower time to sedation and potential for cardiovascular and extrapyramidal side effects.

fundingResearch Grants Council, Hong Kong.

Identifiers

PMID33681744
PMCPMC7910711
OpenAlexW3127521205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.