Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33681658›Full record

ArticleEpilepsia open2021

Developmental and epileptic encephalopathy: Personal utility of a genetic diagnosis for families.

Jennifer S Jeffrey, Janet Leathem, Chontelle King, Heather C Mefford, Kirsty Ross, Lynette G Sadleir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epilepsia open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Genetic Diagnosis in Epilepsy: Implications for Clinical Management.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Current practice in diagnostic genetic testing of the epilepsiesEpileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jennifer S JeffreySchool of Psychology, Massey University, Wellington, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4452-7456
Janet LeathemSchool of Psychology, Massey University, Wellington, New Zealand.
Chontelle KingDepartment of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.
Heather C MeffordDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Genetic Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Kirsty RossSchool of Psychology, Massey University, Wellington, New Zealand.
Lynette G SadleirDepartment of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5355-7115

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Identifying genetic pathogenic variants improves clinical outcomes for children with developmental and epileptic encephalopathy (DEE) by directing therapy and enabling accurate reproductive and prognostic information for families. We aimed to explore the additional personal utility of receiving a genetic diagnosis for families. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with fifteen families of children with a DEE who had received a genetic diagnosis. The interviews stimulated discussion focusing on the impact of receiving a genetic diagnosis for the family. Interview transcripts were analyzed using the six-step systematic process of interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA). Results: Three key themes were identified: "Importance of the label," "Relief to end the diagnostic journey," and "Factors that influence personal utility." Families reported that receiving a genetic label improved their knowledge about the likely trajectory of the DEE, increased their hope for the future, and helped them communicate with others. The relief of finally having an answer for the cause of their child's DEE alleviated parental guilt and self-blame as well as helped families to process their grief and move forward. Delay in receipt of a genetic diagnosis diluted its psychological impact. Significance: To date, the factors associated with the personal utility of a genetic diagnosis for DEEs have been under appreciated. This study demonstrates that identifying a genetic diagnosis for a child's DEE can be a psychological turning point for families. A genetic result has the potential to set these families on an adaptive path toward better quality of life through increased understanding, social connection, and support. Early access to genetic testing is important as it not only increases clinical utility, but also increases personal utility with early mitigation of family stress, trauma, and negative experiences.

Indexed as

Epileptic SyndromesGenetic TestingNeurodevelopmental DisordersAdolescentAdultBrain DiseasesChildChild, PreschoolFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInterviews as TopicMaleParentscaregiverfamily impactgeneticspsychological well‐beingqualitative

Identifiers

PMID33681658
PMCPMC7918330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.