Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33681651›Full record

Trial reportEpilepsia open2021

Perampanel in real-world clinical care of patients with epilepsy: Interim analysis of a phase IV study.

James Wheless, Robert T Wechsler, Marcelo Lancman, Sami Aboumatar, Anna Patten, Manoj Malhotra

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IVRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Epilepsia open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03208660 (A Retrospective Multicenter Study to Investigate Dosage, Efficacy, and Safety of Fycompa in Routine Clinical Care of Patients With Epilepsy), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03208660 completednot on this map

A Retrospective Multicenter Study to Investigate Dosage, Efficacy, and Safety of Fycompa in Routine Clinical Care of Patients With Epilepsy

TypeobservationalSponsorEisai Inc.Ran2017 to 2019Enrolled2,000ConditionsEpilepsyArmsFycompa
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

James WhelessUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center, Le Bonheur Children's Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4735-3431
Robert T WechslerIdaho Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, Boise, ID, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3146-986X
Marcelo LancmanNortheast Regional Epilepsy Group, Hackensack, NJ, USA.
Sami AboumatarAustin Epilepsy Care Center, Austin, TX, USA.
Anna PattenEisai Ltd., Hatfield, Hertfordshire, UK.
Manoj MalhotraEisai Inc., Woodcliff Lake, NJ, USA.
Eisai (United Kingdom) · GBEisai (United States) · USElks Rehabilitation Hospital · USNorthEast Regional Epilepsy Group · USUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To assess the retention rate, efficacy, safety, and dosing of perampanel administered to patients with epilepsy during routine clinical care in the retrospective phase IV, PROVE Study (NCT03208660). Methods: Exposure, efficacy, and safety data were obtained from the medical records of patients initiating perampanel after January 1, 2014, across 29 US study sites. The cutoff date for this interim analysis was October 10, 2018. The primary efficacy endpoint was retention rate. Secondary efficacy endpoints included median percent changes in seizure frequency, seizure-freedom rate, and overall investigator impression of seizure effect. Results: All enrolled patients (N = 1121) received perampanel. Mean (standard deviation [SD]) cumulative duration of exposure to perampanel was 16.6 (14.7) months; overall mean (SD) daily perampanel dose was 5.7 (2.7) mg. Perampanel uptitration occurred weekly (21.1%), biweekly (23.8%), every 3 weeks (1.5%), other (43.3%), and unknown (10.3%). Across the Safety Analysis Set (N = 1121), retention rate on perampanel at 24 months was 49.5% (n = 319/645).At 12 months, the median reduction in seizure frequency per 28 days from baseline in the small number of patients for whom data were available was 75.0% (n = 85), and 30/85 (35.3%) patients were seizure free. Based on investigator impression at the end of treatment, improvement, no change (ie, stable), or worsening of seizures was reported in 54.3%, 33.7%, and 12.0% of patients, respectively.Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 500 (44.6%) patients; the most common were dizziness (9.2%), aggression (5.4%), and irritability (4.5%). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 32 (2.9%) patients. Significance: Favorable retention and sustained efficacy were demonstrated for ≥12 months following initiation of perampanel during routine clinical care in patients with epilepsy.

Indexed as

NitrilesPyridonesReceptors, AMPATreatment OutcomeAdultAnticonvulsantsDizzinessDouble-Blind MethodEpilepsy, GeneralizedFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesSeizuresAnticonvulsantsNitrilesperampanelPyridonesReceptors, AMPAAMPA receptor antagonistantiseizure medicationnoninterventional clinical trialretentionretrospective

Identifiers

PMID33681651
PMCPMC7918328
OpenAlexW3104826033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.