Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33681546›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences2021

Micro-Networks for Robust MR-Guided Low Count PET Imaging.

Casper O da Costa-Luis, Andrew J Reader

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Personalized MR-Informed Diffusion Models for 3D PET Image Reconstruction.IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. PET image denoising based on denoising diffusion probabilistic model.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. A review on AI in PET imaging.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2022
    Review
  13. Noise2Void: unsupervised denoising of PET images.Physics in medicine and biology · 2021
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Casper O da Costa-LuisDepartment of Biomedical EngineeringSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, St. Thomas' HospitalKing's College LondonLondonSE1 7EHU.K.
Andrew J ReaderDepartment of Biomedical EngineeringSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, St. Thomas' HospitalKing's College LondonLondonSE1 7EHU.K.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 203148Wellcome Trust 203148/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Noise suppression is particularly important in low count positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. Post-smoothing (PS) and regularization methods which aim to reduce noise also tend to reduce resolution and introduce bias. Alternatively, anatomical information from another modality such as magnetic resonance (MR) imaging can be used to improve image quality. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are particularly well suited to such joint image processing, but usually require large amounts of training data and have mostly been applied outside the field of medical imaging or focus on classification and segmentation, leaving PET image quality improvement relatively understudied. This article proposes the use of a relatively low-complexity CNN (micro-net) as a post-reconstruction MR-guided image processing step to reduce noise and reconstruction artefacts while also improving resolution in low count PET scans. The CNN is designed to be fully 3-D, robust to very limited amounts of training data, and to accept multiple inputs (including competitive denoising methods). Application of the proposed CNN on simulated low (30 M) count data (trained to produce standard (300 M) count reconstructions) results in a 36% lower normalized root mean squared error (NRMSE, calculated over ten realizations against the ground truth) compared to maximum-likelihood expectation maximization (MLEM) used in clinical practice. In contrast, a decrease of only 25% in NRMSE is obtained when an optimized (using knowledge of the ground truth) PS is performed. A 26% NRMSE decrease is obtained with both RM and optimized PS. Similar improvement is also observed for low count real patient datasets. Overfitting to training data is demonstrated to occur as the network size is increased. In an extreme case, a U-net (which produces better predictions for training data) is shown to completely fail on test data due to overfitting to this case of very limited training data. Meanwhile, the resultant images from the proposed CNN (which has low training data requirements) have lower noise, reduced ringing, and partial volume effects, as well as sharper edges and improved resolution compared to conventional MLEM.

Indexed as

Convolutional neural network (CNN)deep learning (DL)guided reconstructionimage processingimage reconstructionmachine learningmagnetic resonance (MR)maximum-likelihood expectation maximization (MLEM)positron emission tomography (PET)resolution modeling (RM)resolution recovery

Identifiers

PMID33681546
PMCPMC7931458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.