ArticleIEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences2021
Micro-Networks for Robust MR-Guided Low Count PET Imaging.
Article in IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Generative adversarial networks in dental imaging: a systematic review.Oral radiology · 2024Pooled it
- Personalized MR-Informed Diffusion Models for 3D PET Image Reconstruction.IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2026Article
- DG-DiT: Dual-Branch Gating Diffusion Transformer for Multi-Tracer and Multi-Scanner Brain PET Image Denoising.IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2025Article
- Deep learning based bilateral filtering for edge-preserving denoising of respiratory-gated PET.EJNMMI physics · 2024Article
- A Review on Low-Dose Emission Tomography Post-Reconstruction Denoising with Neural Network Approaches.IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2024Article
- Deep learning-based PET image denoising and reconstruction: a review.Radiological physics and technology · 2024Review
- A Review on Low-Dose Emission Tomography Post-Reconstruction Denoising with Neural Network Approaches.ArXiv · 2024Article
- PET image denoising based on denoising diffusion probabilistic model.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024Article
- Image synthesis of interictal SPECT from MRI and PET using machine learning.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Comparative study of the quantitative accuracy of oncological PET imaging based on deep learning methods.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
- Deep learning-based image reconstruction and post-processing methods in positron emission tomography for low-dose imaging and resolution enhancement.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022Review
- A review on AI in PET imaging.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2022Review
- Noise2Void: unsupervised denoising of PET images.Physics in medicine and biology · 2021Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Based Image Enhancement in PET Imaging: Noise Reduction and Resolution Enhancement.PET clinics · 2021Review
- Anatomically aided PET image reconstruction using deep neural networks.Medical physics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Noise suppression is particularly important in low count positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. Post-smoothing (PS) and regularization methods which aim to reduce noise also tend to reduce resolution and introduce bias. Alternatively, anatomical information from another modality such as magnetic resonance (MR) imaging can be used to improve image quality. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are particularly well suited to such joint image processing, but usually require large amounts of training data and have mostly been applied outside the field of medical imaging or focus on classification and segmentation, leaving PET image quality improvement relatively understudied. This article proposes the use of a relatively low-complexity CNN (micro-net) as a post-reconstruction MR-guided image processing step to reduce noise and reconstruction artefacts while also improving resolution in low count PET scans. The CNN is designed to be fully 3-D, robust to very limited amounts of training data, and to accept multiple inputs (including competitive denoising methods). Application of the proposed CNN on simulated low (30 M) count data (trained to produce standard (300 M) count reconstructions) results in a 36% lower normalized root mean squared error (NRMSE, calculated over ten realizations against the ground truth) compared to maximum-likelihood expectation maximization (MLEM) used in clinical practice. In contrast, a decrease of only 25% in NRMSE is obtained when an optimized (using knowledge of the ground truth) PS is performed. A 26% NRMSE decrease is obtained with both RM and optimized PS. Similar improvement is also observed for low count real patient datasets. Overfitting to training data is demonstrated to occur as the network size is increased. In an extreme case, a U-net (which produces better predictions for training data) is shown to completely fail on test data due to overfitting to this case of very limited training data. Meanwhile, the resultant images from the proposed CNN (which has low training data requirements) have lower noise, reduced ringing, and partial volume effects, as well as sharper edges and improved resolution compared to conventional MLEM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.