Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33681342›Full record

ArticleERJ open research2021

Treatment with antifibrotic agents in idiopathic pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis with usual interstitial pneumonia.

Keishi Sugino, Hirotaka Ono, Hiroshige Shimizu, Takeyuki Kurosawa, Keiko Matsumoto, Masahiro Ando, Kiyoshi Mori, Eiyasu Tsuboi, Sakae Homma, Kazuma Kishi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ERJ open research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Rare interstitial lung diseases: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Pulmonary fibroelastosis - A review.Matrix biology : journal of the International Society for Matrix Biology · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. The world of rare interstitial lung diseases.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Keishi SuginoDept of Respiratory Medicine, Tsuboi Hospital, Koriyama city, Fukushima, Japan.
Hirotaka OnoDept of Respiratory Medicine, Tsuboi Hospital, Koriyama city, Fukushima, Japan.
Hiroshige ShimizuDept of Respiratory Medicine, Toho University Omori Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Takeyuki KurosawaDept of Respiratory Medicine, Toho University Omori Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Keiko MatsumotoDept of Radiology, Toho University Omori Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Masahiro AndoDept of Respiratory Medicine, Tsuboi Hospital, Koriyama city, Fukushima, Japan.
Kiyoshi MoriDept of Respiratory Medicine, Tsuboi Hospital, Koriyama city, Fukushima, Japan.
Eiyasu TsuboiDept of Respiratory Medicine, Tsuboi Hospital, Koriyama city, Fukushima, Japan.
Sakae HommaDept of Advanced and Integrated Interstitial Lung Diseases Research, School of Medicine, Toho University, Tokyo, Japan.
Kazuma KishiDept of Respiratory Medicine, Toho University Omori Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Tsuyama Chuo Hospital · JPToho University · JPToho University Omori Medical Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are no established therapeutic options available for idiopathic pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis (IPPFE) apart from supportive care and lung transplantation. Furthermore, it is known that IPPFE with a usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern and lower lobe predominance is a disease entity distinct from idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). To our knowledge, few studies are available that report on the efficacy of antifibrotic agents for IPPFE with UIP.

aimThe aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of antifibrotic agents between IPPFE with UIP and typical IPF in real-world clinical practice. PATIENTS AND

methodsA retrospective analysis was performed on the medical records of all patients at two interstitial lung disease centres. Sixty-four patients were diagnosed as having IPPFE with UIP and 195 patients were diagnosed with typical IPF. We compared the efficacy of antifibrotic agents between these two groups.

resultsSurvival time was significantly shorter in the patients with IPPFE with UIP. Some 125 patients were administered antifibrotic agents for over 6 months (34 with IPPFE with UIP and 91 with typical IPF). Reduced forced vital capacity (FVC) 6 months after treatment with antifibrotic agents was significantly greater in the IPPFE with UIP group than in those in the typical IPF group. Moreover, the change in % predicted FVC was significantly greater during the follow-up in patients with IPPFE with UIP compared with those with typical IPF.

conclusionsThe efficacy of antifibrotic agents was limited in patients with IPPFE with UIP. Thus, IPPFE with UIP remains a fatal and progressive disease.

Identifiers

PMID33681342
PMCPMC7917230
OpenAlexW3110182680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.