ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2021
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Collagen-based Scaffold Supports Tendon-to-bone Healing After Rotator Cuff Repair: An Integrated Translational Study.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Article
- Allergic Reaction to a Bovine-Derived Dural Graft without Eosinophilic Meningitis : A Case Report and Literature Review.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2026Article
- Wireless Stimulation of Motor Cortex Through a Collagen Dura Substitute Using an Ultra-Thin Implant Fabricated on Parylene/PDMS.IEEE transactions on biomedical circuits and systems · 2024Article
- AnFrontiers in surgery · 2024Article
- Human Amniotic Membrane for Dural Repair and Duraplasty: A Systematic Review of Safety and Efficacy.Cureus · 2023Review
- Electrospun Nanofibers for Dura Mater Regeneration: A Mini Review on Current Progress.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Confocal Raman Micro-Spectroscopy for Discrimination of Glycerol Diffusivity in Ex Vivo PorcineLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Absorbable Artificial Dura Versus Nonabsorbable Artificial Dura in Decompressive Craniectomy for Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Retrospective Cohort Study in Two Centers.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
- Evaluation of Biocompatibility and Healing Properties of Dural Substitutes Produced by Electrospinning Technology.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dura substitutes are applied in duraplasty to repair lost or damaged dura. Collagen-based dura substitutes are mainstream products in both the US and Chinese markets. In this study, dura substitute devices with potential dura regeneration ability are evaluated. The dura substitutes are composed of fibrous type I collagen that were purified from bovine tendon. Physical and chemical characterization demonstrated that the tested dura substitute has desirable porous scaffolding structures and is composed of highly purified type I collagen. The collagen dura substitutes were further investigated
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.