Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33681145›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in chemistry2021

Viroporins vs. Other Pore-Forming Proteins: What Lessons Can We Take?

Eva Žerovnik

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in chemistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Microbiome research reports · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eva ŽerovnikDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular and Structural Biology, J. Stefan Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Jožef Stefan Institute · SI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pore-forming proteins (PFPs) exist in virtually all domains of life, and by disrupting cellular membranes, depending on the pore size, they cause ion dis-balance, small substances, or even protein efflux/influx, influencing cell's signaling routes and fate. Such pore-forming proteins exist from bacteria to viruses and also shape host defense systems, including innate immunity. There is strong evidence that amyloid toxicity is also caused by prefibrillar oligomers making "amyloid pores" into cellular membranes. For most of the PFPs, a 2-step mechanism of protein-membrane interaction takes place on the "lipid rafts," membrane microdomains rich in gangliosides and cholesterol. In this mini-review paper, common traits of different PFPs are looked at. Possible ways for therapy of channelopathies and/or modulating immunity relevant to the new threat of SARS-CoV-2 infections could be learnt from such comparisons.

Indexed as

amyloid porechannel formationdrug targetion conductance activitySARS-CoV-2 E protein

Identifiers

PMID33681145
PMCPMC7930612
OpenAlexW3130323237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.