ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2020
Airway status at arrival to the Emergency department among patients with life threatening emergencies.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite the improvement in prehospital care in the last decade in India through dedicated ambulance services, airway management is often performed by undertrained or untrained personnel and remains teetering to the edge of collapse. This study aimed at assessing the airway status in critically ill patients at their arrival to the Emergency Department (ED).
methodsThis prospective study included all triage priority I patients presenting to the ED during August 2017 and September 2017. Details of their airway status at arrival to the ED was noted. The severity at presentation and outcome of patients brought in ambulances and private vehicles were determined using descriptive analytic statistics and bivariate logistic regression analysis.
resultsThe study included 450 patients, with a male predominance (65.3%). Only a third (31%) of patients were brought in ambulances with a reminder through various means of transport. Compared to patients brought by private vehicles, patients brought to the ED by ambulances had a higher odds of being hypoxic at ED arrival [OR: 1.63 (95% CI: 1.08-2.46);
conclusionPrivate vehicles still remain the predominant mode of prehospital transport though ambulances are used to transport sicker patients. More than half the critically ill patients remained hypoxic on arrival to the ED. Our study clearly highlights the glaring deficiency in airway status at ED arrival and stresses the urgent need to improve prehospital care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.