Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33680960›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2021

Clinical Benefit of Antiviral Agents for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients With Low Preoperative HBV-DNA Loads Undergoing Curative Resection: A Meta-Analysis.

Kai-Xuan Liu, Jian-Guo Hong, Rui Wu, Zhao-Ru Dong, Ya-Fei Yang, Yu-Chuan Yan, Chun-Cheng Yang, Lun-Jie Yan, Sheng-Yu Yao, Hai-Chao Li and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kai-Xuan LiuDepartment of General Surgery, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Jian-Guo HongDepartment of General Surgery, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Rui WuDepartment of General Surgery, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Zhao-Ru DongDepartment of General Surgery, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Ya-Fei YangDepartment of General Surgery, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Yu-Chuan YanDepartment of General Surgery, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Chun-Cheng YangDepartment of General Surgery, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Lun-Jie YanDepartment of General Surgery, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Sheng-Yu YaoDepartment of General Surgery, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Hai-Chao LiDepartment of General Surgery, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Xu-Ting ZhiDepartment of General Surgery, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Tao LiDepartment of General Surgery, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Qilu Hospital of Shandong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsThe clinical benefit of adjuvant antiviral therapy after curative therapy for HCC in patients with high preoperative HBV-DNA loads has been studied widely but that in patients with low preoperative HBV-DNA loads remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of antiviral treatment prophylaxis on HBV reactivation, overall survival (OS), and postoperative liver function in patients with low preoperative HBV-DNA levels undergoing curative resection.

methodsA meta-analysis was conducted by searching Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library until May 2020. We used REVMAN for data analysis and completed the study under the PRISMA guidelines.

resultsThree randomized trials and seven cohort studies, comprising of 1,131 individuals, were included in the meta-analysis. Antiviral treatment significantly reduced the rate of HBV reactivation after curative treatment of HCC, with a pooled risk ratio of 0.12 (95% c.i. 0.07 to 0.21; P < 0.00001). The trials were consistently favorable for the antiviral group, with a pooled hazard ratio of 0.52 (95% c.i. 0.37 to 0.74; P = 0.0002) in respect of OS rate. However, by pooling the data from studies that reported ALT on the 30th day postoperatively, the result didn't reach statistical significance (mean difference -4.38, 95% c.i. -13.83 to 5.07; P = 0.36). The I² values of the heterogeneity test for the above three comparisons are zero.

conclusionAntiviral therapy during curative resection is effective in reducing HBV reactivation and improving OS rate in HCC patients with low viral load.

Indexed as

antiviral therapyHBV-DNA loadHBV reactivationhepatocellular carcinomaprognosis

Identifiers

PMID33680960
PMCPMC7933452
OpenAlexW3132517675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.