Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33680934›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2020

Multiple U-Net-Based Automatic Segmentations and Radiomics Feature Stability on Ultrasound Images for Patients With Ovarian Cancer.

Juebin Jin, Haiyan Zhu, Jindi Zhang, Yao Ai, Ji Zhang, Yinyan Teng, Congying Xie, Xiance Jin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Radiomics analysis of ultrasound images to discriminate between benign and malignant adnexal masses with solid morphology on ultrasound.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2025
    Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Juebin JinDepartment of Medical Engineering, Wenzhou Medical University First Affiliated Hospital, Wenzhou, China.
Haiyan ZhuDepartment of Gynecology, Shanghai First Maternal and Infant Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Jindi ZhangDepartment of Gynecology, Wenzhou Medical University First Affiliated Hospital, Wenzhou, China.
Yao AiDepartment of Radiotherapy Center, Wenzhou Medical University First Affiliated Hospital, Wenzhou, China.
Ji ZhangDepartment of Radiotherapy Center, Wenzhou Medical University First Affiliated Hospital, Wenzhou, China.
Yinyan TengDepartment of Ultrasound Imaging, Wenzhou Medical University First Affiliated Hospital, Wenzhou, China.
Congying XieDepartment of Radiotherapy Center, Wenzhou Medical University First Affiliated Hospital, Wenzhou, China.
Xiance JinDepartment of Radiotherapy Center, Wenzhou Medical University First Affiliated Hospital, Wenzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Few studies have reported the reproducibility and stability of ultrasound (US) images based radiomics features obtained from automatic segmentation in oncology. The purpose of this study is to study the accuracy of automatic segmentation algorithms based on multiple U-net models and their effects on radiomics features from US images for patients with ovarian cancer. A total of 469 US images from 127 patients were collected and randomly divided into three groups: training sets (353 images), validation sets (23 images), and test sets (93 images) for automatic segmentation models building. Manual segmentation of target volumes was delineated as ground truth. Automatic segmentations were conducted with U-net, U-net++, U-net with Resnet as the backbone (U-net with Resnet), and CE-Net. A python 3.7.0 and package Pyradiomics 2.2.0 were used to extract radiomic features from the segmented target volumes. The accuracy of automatic segmentations was evaluated by Jaccard similarity coefficient (JSC), dice similarity coefficient (DSC), and average surface distance (ASD). The reliability of radiomics features were evaluated by Pearson correlation and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). CE-Net and U-net with Resnet outperformed U-net and U-net++ in accuracy performance by achieving a DSC, JSC, and ASD of 0.87, 0.79, 8.54, and 0.86, 0.78, 10.00, respectively. A total of 97 features were extracted from the delineated target volumes. The average Pearson correlation was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.83-0.89), 0.87 (95% CI, 0.84-0.90), 0.88 (95% CI, 0.86-0.91), and 0.90 (95% CI, 0.88-0.92) for U-net++, U-net, U-net with Resnet, and CE-Net, respectively. The average ICC was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.81-0.87), 0.85 (95% CI, 0.82-0.88), 0.88 (95% CI, 0.85-0.90), and 0.89 (95% CI, 0.86-0.91) for U-net++, U-net, U-net with Resnet, and CE-Net, respectively. CE-Net based segmentation achieved the best radiomics reliability. In conclusion, U-net based automatic segmentation was accurate enough to delineate the target volumes on US images for patients with ovarian cancer. Radiomics features extracted from automatic segmented targets showed good reproducibility and for reliability further radiomics investigations.

Indexed as

automatic segmentationovarian cancerradiomicsultrasound imagesU-net

Identifiers

PMID33680934
PMCPMC7930567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.