Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33680924›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2020

Evaluation of 18F-DCFPyL PSMA PET/CT for Prostate Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

Ke-Hao Pan, Jin-Feng Wang, Chun-Ying Wang, Abdul Aziz Nikzad, Fang Q Kong, Li Jian, Yin-Qiu Zhang, Xiao-Ming Lu, Bin Xu, Ya-Li Wang and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effect ofFrontiers in medicine · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Evaluating [Journal of market access & health policy · 2026
    Article
  4. The Role of Nuclear Medicine in Prostate Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  5. B-CLL with negativeEJNMMI reports · 2025
    Article
  6. Clinical value of [Theranostics · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. PSMA PET in Imaging Prostate Cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ke-Hao PanDepartment of Urology, Affiliated Zhongda Hospital of Southeast University, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Jin-Feng WangDepartment of Urology, Yancheng Third People's Hospital, Yancheng, China.
Chun-Ying WangDepartment of Urology, Affiliated Zhongda Hospital of Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Abdul Aziz NikzadDepartment of Urology, Affiliated Zhongda Hospital of Southeast University, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Fang Q KongDepartment of Nosocomial Infection, Affiliated Zhongda Hospital of Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Li JianDepartment of Urology, Jinhu People's Hospital, Jinghua, China.
Yin-Qiu ZhangDepartment of Digestion, Affiliated Zhongda Hospital of Southeast University, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Xiao-Ming LuDepartment of Urology, Yancheng Third People's Hospital, Yancheng, China.
Bin XuDepartment of Urology, Affiliated Zhongda Hospital of Southeast University, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Ya-Li WangDepartment of Urology, Affiliated Zhongda Hospital of Southeast University, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Ming ChenDepartment of Urology, Affiliated Zhongda Hospital of Southeast University, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Zhongda Hospital Southeast University · CNLishui City People's Hospital · CNYancheng Third People's Hospital · CNHonghu People’s Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo systematically review the clinical value of 18F-DCFPyL prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA PET/CT) in the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa).

methodsLiterature concerning 18F-DCFPyL PSMA PET/CT in the diagnosis of prostate cancer published from 2015 to 2020 was electronically searched in the databases including PubMed and Embase. Statistical analysis was carried out with STATA 15 software, and the quality of included studies was tested with quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS) items. The heterogeneity of the included data was tested.

resultsIn total, nine pieces of literature involving 426 patients met the inclusion criteria. The heterogeneity of the study group was not obvious. The SEN, SPE, LR+, LR-, DOR as well as AUC of 18F-DCFPyL PSMA PET/CT diagnosis of prostate cancer were 0.91, 0.90, 8.9, 0.10, 93, and 0.93. The pooled DR of 18F-DCFPyL labeled PSMA PET/CT in PCa was 92%. The pooled DR was 89% for PSA≥0.5 ng/ml and 49% for PSA < 0.5ng/ml.

conclusion18F-DCFPyL PSMA PET/CT had good sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. The DR of 18F-DCFPyL PSMA PET/CT was correlated with PSA value. Further large-sample, high-quality studies were needed.

Indexed as

18F-DCFPyL PSMA PET/CTdiagnosisimagingmeta-analysisprostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID33680924
PMCPMC7925846
OpenAlexW3131091706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.