ArticleRestorative dentistry & endodontics2021
A micro-computed tomographic study using a novel test model to assess the filling ability and volumetric changes of bioceramic root repair materials.
Article in Restorative dentistry & endodontics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of the physicochemical properties and adhesive interface quality of BioRoot Flow and BioRoot RCS endodontic sealers: An in vitro study.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
- Physical and surface analysis of calcium silicate Clinker after acid challenge: a micro-CT and SEM study.Brazilian oral research · 2026Article
- Effect of Ultrasonic Condensation Time on Void Formation and Microhardness of Well-RootMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Physicochemical properties and periodontal ligament stem cell response to NeoMTA 2.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Article
- Bioceramics in Endodontics: Limitations and Future Innovations-A Review.Dentistry journal · 2025Review
- Evaluation of volumetric and surface stability of calcium silicate-based repair cements at different pHs.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Article
- Comparative evaluation of sealing potential of mineral trioxide aggregate, biodentine, and bio-C repair in furcation perforations: A glucose penetration study.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2025Article
- Micro-CT Analysis of Apical Plug Using Various Premixed Bio-ceramic Putties: An In Vitro Study.European endodontic journal · 2025Article
- Healing the Open Apex: A Case Report on Innovative Apexogenesis of a Maxillary Molar Using Bio-C Repair.Cureus · 2024Article
- Examining the Physicochemical Composition of Three Bioceramic Putties for Endodontic Use.European endodontic journal · 2024Article
- Volumetric change of calcium silicate-based repair materials in a simulated inflammatory environment: A micro-computed tomography study.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2024Article
- Biocompatibility, bioactivity, porosity, and sealer/dentin interface of bioceramic ready-to-use sealers using a dentin-tube model.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Effect of blood and artificial saliva contamination on marginal adaptation and sealing ability of different retrograde filling materials: A comparative analysis.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2024Article
- In vivo method to evaluate volumetric changes in bioceramic repair materials.Brazilian dental journal · 2024Article
- Effect of pH on the solubility and volumetric change of ready-to-use Bio-C Repair bioceramic material.Brazilian oral research · 2024Article
- Physicochemical properties, cytotoxicity and bioactivity of a ready-to-use bioceramic repair material.Brazilian dental journalArticle
- Do intracanal medications used in regenerative endodontics affect the bond strength of powder-to-liquid and ready-to-use cervical sealing materials?Journal of conservative dentistry : JCDArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesNew premixed bioceramic root repair materials require moisture for setting. Using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT), this study evaluated the filling ability and volumetric changes of calcium silicate-based repair materials (mineral trioxide aggregate repair high-plasticity [MTA HP] and Bio-C Repair, Angelus), in comparison with a zinc oxide and eugenol-based material (intermediate restorative material [IRM]; Dentsply DeTrey). MATERIALS AND
methodsGypsum models with cavities 3 mm deep and 1 mm in diameter were manufactured and scanned using micro-CT (SkyScan 1272. Bruker). The cavities were filled with the cements and scanned again to evaluate their filling capacity. Another scan was performed after immersing the samples in distilled water for 7 days to assess the volumetric changes of the cements. The statistical significance of differences in the data was evaluated using analysis of variance and the Tukey test with a 5% significance level.
resultsBio-C Repair had a greater filling ability than MTA HP (
conclusionsBio-C Repair is a new endodontic material with excellent filling capacity and low volumetric change. The gypsum model proposed for evaluating filling ability and volumetric changes by micro-CT had appropriate and reproducible results. This model may enhance the physicochemical evaluation of premixed bioceramic materials, which need moisture for setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.