ArticleJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2021
Conservative surgery for chronic diabetic foot osteomyelitis: Procedures and recommendations.
Article in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Novel Treatments for Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis: A Narrative Review.Microorganisms · 2025Review
- Determining the Best Noninvasive Test for Peripheral Arterial Disease Diagnosis to Predict Diabetic Foot Ulcer Healing in Patients Following Endovascular Revascularization.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Analysis of the Influence of Diabetic Nephropathy in Patients with Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Foot Osteomyelitis Caused by Multidrug- and Extensively Drug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria.Maedica · 2023Article
- Safety and Efficacy of Several Versus Isolated Prophylactic Flexor Tenotomies in Diabetes Patients: A 1-Year Prospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Role of the Healico© Wound Care Smartphone Application in Preventing a Foot Amputation in a 65-Year-Old Patient with Diabetes.The American journal of case reports · 2022Article
- The Fate of Antibiotic Impregnated Cement Space in Treatment for Forefoot Osteomyelitis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Dual-functional hybrid quaternized chitosan/Mg/alginate dressing with antibacterial and angiogenic potential for diabetic wound healing.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2021Article
- Treating Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis: A Practical State-of-the-Art Update.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Osteomyelitis (OM) is the most frequent infection associated with diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) that typically involve the forefoot, the most common location of DFU. Conservative surgical procedures could be attractive alternative that reduces minor and major amputations and avoid future recurrence thus preserving the functionally of the foot. This review aimed to analyze and describe the current evidence on conservative diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) surgical procedures depending on DFU location and indications. A narrative revision of the evidence was carried out by searching Medline through PubMed databases from inception to late July 2020 to identify retrospective, prospective, and randomized controlled trials pertaining to conservative DFO procedures on the forefoot. Seven types of conservative surgical procedures for DFO treatment in the forefoot are described in this review: (1) partial or total distal phalangectomy, (2) arthroplasty of the proximal or distal interphalangeal joint, (3) distal Syme amputation, (4) percutaneous flexor tenotomy, (5) sesamoidectomy, (6) arthroplasty of the metatarsophalangeal joint, and (7) metatarsal head resection. When indicated, conservative surgery for DFUs in patients with chronic forefoot OM is a safe and effective option that increases the chances of healing and reduces the possibility of limb loss and death compared with radical amputation procedures. Since a lack of sufficient evidence supporting this procedure exists, future investigations should be focused on the random clinical trial (RCT) design. The results of prospective trials could help surgeons select the appropriate procedure in each case in order to minimize complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.