Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33680539›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2021

Comparison of confocal and non-confocal split-detection cone photoreceptor imaging.

Nripun Sredar, Moataz Razeen, Bartlomiej Kowalski, Joseph Carroll, Alfredo Dubra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. How early can we detect diabetic retinopathy? A narrative review of imaging tools for structural assessment of the retina.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Hyalocyte origin, structure, and imaging.Expert review of ophthalmology · 2022
    Article
  18. Optica · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nripun SredarDepartment of Ophthalmology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA 94303, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9567-9815
Moataz RazeenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA 94303, USA.
Bartlomiej KowalskiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA 94303, USA.
Joseph CarrollDepartment of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8640-1029
Alfredo DubraDepartment of Ophthalmology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA 94303, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6506-9020

Funding

Assessing Photoreceptor Structure and Function in Normal and Diseased RetinaeR01EY017607 · NEI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI Joseph Carroll · 2008 to 2026
$8.3M
Stanford Vision Research CoreP30EY026877 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Jeffrey L Goldberg · 2017 to 2026
$8.0M
Platform Technologies for Microscopic Retinal Imaging: Development & TranslationU01EY025477 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DUBRA, ALFREDO · 2015 to 2019
$4.4M
Axially-resolved Spectroscopic Ophthalmic ImagingR01EY025231 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DUBRA, ALFREDO · 2015 to 2019
$1.9M
Development, Validation and Application of Metabolic Imaging in GlaucomaR01EY028287 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DUBRA, ALFREDO, GOLDBERG, JEFFREY L · 2017 to 2019
$1.1M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY026877NEI NIH HHS R01 EY017607NEI NIH HHS R01 EY025231NEI NIH HHS R01 EY028287NEI NIH HHS U01 EY025477
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quadrant reflectance confocal and non-confocal scanning light ophthalmoscope images of the photoreceptor mosaic were recorded in a subject with congenital achromatopsia (ACHM) and a normal control. These images, captured with various circular and annular apertures, were used to calculate split-detection images, revealing two cone photoreceptor contrast mechanisms. The first contrast mechanism, maximal in the non-confocal 5.5-10 Airy disk diameter annular region, is unrelated to the cone reflectivity in confocal or flood illumination imaging. The second mechanism, maximal for confocal split-detection, is related to the cone reflectivity in confocal or flood illumination imaging that originates from the ellipsoid zone and/or inner-outer segment junction. Seeking to maximize image contrast, split-detection images were generated using various quadrant detector combinations, with opposite (diagonal) quadrant detectors producing the highest contrast. Split-detection generated with the addition of adjacent quadrant detector pairs, shows lower contrast, while azimuthal split-detection images, calculated from adjacent quadrant detectors, showed the lowest contrast. Finally, the integration of image pairs with orthogonal split directions was used to produce images in which the photoreceptor contrast does not change with direction.

Identifiers

PMID33680539
PMCPMC7901313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.