ArticleBiomedical optics express2021
Effect and correction of optode coupling errors in breast imaging using diffuse optical tomography.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Difference imaging from single measurements in diffuse optical tomography: a deep learning approach.Journal of biomedical optics · 2022Article
- Ultrasound segmentation-guided edge artifact reduction in diffuse optical tomography using connected component analysis.Biomedical optics express · 2021Article
- A Data Self-Calibration Method Based on High-Density Parallel Plate Diffuse Optical Tomography for Breast Cancer Imaging.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In diffuse optical tomography (DOT) and spectroscopy (DOS) using handheld probes, tissue curvature can cause bad fiber-to-tissue contact. Understanding and minimizing image artifacts caused by these coupling errors would significantly improve DOT and DOS image quality. In this work, we utilized Monte Carlo simulations and experiments with gelatin-Intralipid phantoms to systematically study the influence of source or detector (optode) coupling errors. Optode coupling errors can increase the amplitude and decrease the phase of the measured diffuse reflectance, creating artifacts in the reconstructed absorption maps, such as hot spots on the edges. We propose an outlier removal algorithm that can correct these image artifacts, and we demonstrate its performance using simulations, phantom experiments, and breast patient data acquired with bad probe contact due to a dense or small breast. Further, we designed and implemented a new resistance-type thin-film force sensor array that provides real-time optode coupling feedback and guides the outlier removal to minimize optode coupling errors. Our approaches and study results have significant implications for reducing image artifacts arising from handheld probes, which are commonly used with mobile and wearable DOT and DOS devices.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.