Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33680490›Full record

ArticleObesity science & practice2021

Digital anthropometry for body circumference measurements: Toward the development of universal three-dimensional optical system analysis software.

Sima Sobhiyeh, Samantha Kennedy, Alexander Dunkel, Marcelline E Dechenaud, Jerome A Weston, John Shepherd, Peter Wolenski, Steven B Heymsfield

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity science & practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sima SobhiyehMetabolism-Body-Composition Pennington Biomedical Research Center LSU System Baton Rouge Louisiana USA.
Samantha KennedyMetabolism-Body-Composition Pennington Biomedical Research Center LSU System Baton Rouge Louisiana USA.
Alexander DunkelDepartment of Mathematics Louisiana State University Baton Rouge Louisiana USA.
Marcelline E DechenaudDepartment of Mathematics Louisiana State University Baton Rouge Louisiana USA.
Jerome A WestonDepartment of Mathematics Louisiana State University Baton Rouge Louisiana USA.
John ShepherdCancer Center University of Hawaii Honolulu Hawaii USA.
Peter WolenskiDepartment of Mathematics Louisiana State University Baton Rouge Louisiana USA.
Steven B HeymsfieldMetabolism-Body-Composition Pennington Biomedical Research Center LSU System Baton Rouge Louisiana USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1127-9425
Louisiana State University · USPennington Biomedical Research Center · USUniversity of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa · US

Funding

ROLE OF DIETARY CONSTITUENTS ON GENE EXPRESSION IN INTESTINAL EPITHELIUMP30DK040561 · NIDDK · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Alessio Fasano · 1994 to 2026
$31.6M
Research BaseP30DK072476 · NIDDK · LSU PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CTR · PI ROBERT A KESTERSON · 2005 to 2026
$26.5M
Optical Body Composition and Health AssessmentR01DK109008 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA · PI HEYMSFIELD, STEVEN, SHEPHERD, JOHN ALAN · 2016 to 2020
$3.2M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK040561NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK072476NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK109008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectiveDigital anthropometric (DA) assessments are increasingly being administered with three-dimensional (3D) optical devices in clinical settings that manage patients with obesity and related metabolic disorders. However, anatomic measurement sites are not standardized across manufacturers, precluding use of published reference values and pooling of data across research centers. SUBJECTS/

methodsThis study aimed to develop universal 3D analysis software by applying novel programming strategies capable of producing device-independent DA estimates that agree with conventional anthropometric (CA) measurements made at well-defined anatomic sites. A series of technical issues related to proprietary methods of 3D geometrical reconstruction and image analysis were addressed in developing major software components. To evaluate software accuracy, comparisons were made to CA circumference measurements made with a flexible tape at eleven standard anatomic sites in up to 35 adults scanned with three different commercial 3D optical devices.

resultsOverall, group mean CA and DA values across the three systems were in good agreement, with ∼2 cm systematic differences; CA and DA estimates were highly correlated (all

conclusionsAvailability of this software, with future refinements, has the potential to facilitate clinical applications and creation of large pooled uniform anthropometric databases.

Indexed as

anthropometrynutritional assessmentthree‐dimensional optical imagingwaist circumference

Identifiers

PMID33680490
PMCPMC7909596
OpenAlexW3097811799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.